Keep the ‘Technical’, Let’s Bring Consistency in 3(k)
Section 3(k) is one of the most curious provisions in the Indian Patents Act. A mere 13-word sub-section, 3(k) has today become a hot mess. Despite the release of CRI Guidelines in July 2025 (the fourth such iteration of the guidelines), 3(k) is none the fuzzier. The actual scope of the words used in 3(k) continues to elude us. Last week, the Delhi HC, in Blackberry v. Controller, had another opportunity to opine on patentability u/s. 3(k). The invention in question was a method to […]
Keep the ‘Technical’, Let’s Bring Consistency in 3(k) Read More »










