Trademark

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 22- April 28)

/ By / Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the Ericsson- Lava SEP dispute, disclaimed trademarks, and impact of patents on innovation in academia. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week Some Thoughts on the “Fairness” of the Delhi High Court’s Ericsson-Lava FRAND Determination- Part II Continuing their discussion on the DHC Ericsson- Lava decision, Swaraj and Praharsh critique the reasons (and lack […]

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 22- April 28) Read More »

Disclaimed Trademarks: Protection or Usurpation

/ By / Trademark

We are pleased to bring to you this guest post on the statutory position and judicial interpretation of disclaimed marks in the Indian trademarks regime. The post is authored by Surabhi Katare who is a fifth year student at Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur. Surabhi is interested in IPR, media, and tech laws and wants to pursue a career in IP and allied areas. Disclaimed Trademarks: Protection or Usurpation By Surabhi Katare While the foundational principle of trademarks as a

Disclaimed Trademarks: Protection or Usurpation Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 15- April 21)

/ By / Copyright, Patent, Trademark

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the Ericsson- Lava SEP dispute, unauthorized use of protected material to train Gen AI, and CGPDTM’s call for feedback on IP administration in India. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week Looking for the Reasons in the Delhi High Court’s FRAND Determination in the Ericsson- Lava SEP Case- Part I The Ericsson-Lava SEP decision

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 15- April 21) Read More »

CGPDTM Invites Feedback on IP Administration in the Country

/ By / Copyright, Design, Geographical Indication, Patent, Trademark

In a welcome move, the office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks (CGPDTM) has invited feedback on IP administration in the country by CGPDTM, and the Copyright and GI Registries. For this, the Office has released a 6 page questionnaire on April 15 and has kept April 22 11:59 PM as the deadline to share the responses to this questionnaire. The questionnaire specifies that the feedback will be kept confidential and only the aggregate data from the survey

CGPDTM Invites Feedback on IP Administration in the Country Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (8 April- 14 April)

/ By / Copyright, Patent, Plant Variety Protection, Trademark

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the India- EFTA TEPA, AP High Court’s curious findings on fair use, and Delhi High Court’s order imposing INR 1 lakh as damages on Google for failing to disclose information about their corresponding foreign applications. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week EFTA-India Free Trade Agreement and Patents Rules Amendment: Compromising Public Accountability and

SpicyIP Weekly Review (8 April- 14 April) Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 1- April 7)

/ By / Copyright, Patent, Trademark

[This weekly review is co-authored with SpicyIP Intern Vishno Sudheendra. Vishno is a second year law student at the NLSIU, Bangalore. His previous post can be accessed here. Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the Delhi High Court’s decisions in Sulphur Mills v. Dharmaj Crop Guard and Kudos Pharma v. Natco. Along with this dont forget to read our review of SpicyIP posts published in the month of February, from 2005

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 1- April 7) Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 25- March 31)

/ By / Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the DHC directives to resolve issues arising out of TM registry website, DHC decision on non literal patent infringement, and Govt. of Goa’s circular on 52(1)(za). Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week Delhi High Court Imposes Damages Worth INR 244 Crores on Lava in the Ericsson-Lava SEP Dispute In an important SEP development

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 25- March 31) Read More »

An End to IP Attorneys Association’s Struggle with the Trade Mark Registry’s Portal?

/ By / Trademark

In light of the recent orders by the Delhi High Court to resolve the problems caused by the Trademark Registry websites’ outage, we are pleased to bring to you this post by SpicyIP Intern Aarav Gupta, discussing the interim measures put in place by the Court. Aarav is a third-year law student at National Law University, Delhi. He is passionate about geopolitics, foreign policy, international trade, and intellectual property and spends his time reading and watching sports. His previous post can be accessed

An End to IP Attorneys Association’s Struggle with the Trade Mark Registry’s Portal? Read More »

Mischief, Manifestation, and the Michelin Trademark!

/ By / Trademark

In light of the recent controversy concerning a Delhi-based restaurant’s use of a “Michelin plaque”, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Dr. (Prof.) Sunanda Bharti on the Michelin Stars and its interaction was trademark laws. Prof. Bharti is a Professor of Law at Delhi University, and her previous posts can be accessed here. Mischief, Manifestation, and the Michelin Trademark! By Dr. (Prof.) Sunanda Bharti Vir Sanghvi, a prominent Indian journalist and author known for his insightful

Mischief, Manifestation, and the Michelin Trademark! Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 18- March 24)

/ By / Copyright, Patent, Trademark

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of posts on the new Patent (Amendment) Rules, and some thoughts on safeguards which can be used by intermediaries to prevent trademark infringement. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week A Patent System’s Job is to Incentivize More Innovation, Not Merely More Patents: Looking at the New Patent (Amendment) Rules- Part I In this two part post

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 18- March 24) Read More »

Scroll to Top