Geographical Indication

CGPDTM Invites Feedback on IP Administration in the Country

In a welcome move, the office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks (CGPDTM) has invited feedback on IP administration in the country by CGPDTM, and the Copyright and GI Registries. For this, the Office has released a 6 page questionnaire on April 15 and has kept April 22 11:59 PM as the deadline to share the responses to this questionnaire. The questionnaire specifies that the feedback will be kept confidential and only the aggregate data from the survey […]

CGPDTM Invites Feedback on IP Administration in the Country Read More »

PAC Chairperson Demands Probe by Chief Vigilance Commission Into Corruption Allegations Against CGPDTM!

“Out of the frying pan, into the fire” seems to sum up the current predicament of the Office of the Controller General of Patent, Designs and Trade Mark (CGPDTM). Only a few weeks after somehow organizing the Patent and Design Examiners’ Exams, and fixing the long-standing issue with the trademark registry website, the office has ended up in another turmoil. As reported by the Print, the Press Trust of India, and tweeted by the ANI, Member of Parliament and Chairperson

PAC Chairperson Demands Probe by Chief Vigilance Commission Into Corruption Allegations Against CGPDTM! Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 1- January 7)

This weekly review is co-authored with SpicyIP intern Vedika Chawla. Vedika is a third-year B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) student at National Law University, Delhi. Her previous posts can be accessed here. Wrapping up the first week of 2024, here is a brief recap of our hard-hitting post on TKDL, the detailed comments on the draft Calcutta High Court IPR Division Rules, and an informative take on scandalous and obscene trademark prosecution in India.  Highlights of the Week Comments on Draft IPR Division

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 1- January 7) Read More »

Comments on Draft IPR Division Rules of High Court at Calcutta, 2023

[This post is co-authored by SpicyIP Intern Pranav Aggarwal, Praharsh and Swaraj. Pranav is a second-year student pursuing B.A.LL.B.(Hons) at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab. He has a keen interest in commercial laws, especially in IP and allied fields. His previous post can be accessed here.] [Edit: Our final submissions co-authored by Praharsh Gour, Pranav, Swaraj, and Malobika Sen were sent in on 5th January, and can be viewed here.] On December 19, 2023 the High Court at Calcutta published the

Comments on Draft IPR Division Rules of High Court at Calcutta, 2023 Read More »

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

[This post has been co-authored with Jyotpreet Kaur, Tejaswini Kaushal, Praharsh Gour, and Swaraj Barooah].  As 2023 comes to an end, in line with our annual tradition, we take stock of the top IP developments that occurred this year. And as we move to the cusp of the new year, here’s to wishing our readers a very happy and healthy year ahead! As in previous years, we have divided these developments into five categories: a) Top 10 IP Judgements/Orders (Topicality/Impact)

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023 Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

From an in-depth discussion on the terms of copyright and translations in India to the recent UK Supreme Court’s order regarding the patentability of inventions by an AI, we had some engaging posts on this blog this week. To read these, along with a round up of IP developments around the country, and world, read on below. Highlights of the Week The Evolution of Copyright and Translation Terms in India: Part I- Framing the Debate Discussing the history of the

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24) Read More »

Interpreting “and” Under Section 21 of the GI Act: The MP High Court’s Interaction with TRIPS and the GI Act

[Recently, the Madhya Pradesh High Court passed a detailed order clarifying that a Registered Proprietor is not required to implead an Authorised User to institute GI infringement suits. SpicyIP intern Jyotpreet Kaur writes on this development. Jyotpreet is a third-year law student from the National Law University, Delhi who is interested in Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law and looks to study their interaction with each other. Her previous post can be accessed here.] On 18th December 2023, a 2

Interpreting “and” Under Section 21 of the GI Act: The MP High Court’s Interaction with TRIPS and the GI Act Read More »

SpicyIP Tidbit: India-Pakistan Basmati Dispute Dismissed by DHC

Adding another layer of spice to the Basmati rice IP dispute between India and Pakistan, recently the Delhi High Court dismissed the 15 years old suit (pdf) against the export of Basmati rice by India, for non-prosecution from the plaintiff since 2020. As a quick background, this suit was filed seeking an injunction against the Govt. of India’s notification permitting export of “evolved” Basmati Rice under the mark “Super Basmati”. The suit was filed by Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt.

SpicyIP Tidbit: India-Pakistan Basmati Dispute Dismissed by DHC Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 13- November 19)

Here are our summaries of the blog posts published last week along with the summaries of some interesting orders from different courts. Anything we are missing out on? Please drop a comment and let us know. Highlight of the Week HULM Entertainment v. Fantasy Sports: Reanalysing Originality, Idea-Expression Dichotomy and Copyrightability of GUIs The ongoing dispute between Hulm Entertainment and Fantasy Sports before the Delhi High Court is a roller coaster ride, involving intricate elements such as concept notes, the copyrightability

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 13- November 19) Read More »

Draft Rules for Geographical Indications Published, Comments Invited by November 19

The Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MoCI) published 2023 Draft Amendments to the Geographical Indication Rules 2002, in the Gazette of India on October 20, inviting objections and suggestions from the relevant stakeholders. The draft also calls for comments from stakeholders within 30 days of its publication in the Gazette. The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) and the Controller General of Patent, Designs and Trademark (CGPDTM) announced it on their website on October 27, 2023 i.e.

Draft Rules for Geographical Indications Published, Comments Invited by November 19 Read More »

Scroll to Top