Patent

Announcing the Finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025!

After an engaging pre-final round on February 10, we are delighted to announce the finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation, 2025 organized by SpicyIP and CIPAM, DPIIT! The pre-final round witnessed thoughtful presentations from our shortlisted teams, followed by rigorous engagement with questions from the fantastic panel of judges comprising Ms. Sumathi Chandrashekaran, Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, and Mr. Murali Neelakantan. We are immensely grateful to our judges for their time and careful evaluation, […]

Announcing the Finalists of the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025! Read More »

ER Squibb to map Zydus’s product: Does this mean closure?

There has been another development in ER Squibb v Zydus, at the center of which is Nivolumab, an anti-cancer drug. Readers will remember that on 12th January 2025, a division bench of the Delhi HC had allowed Zydus to launch their biosimilar product, ZRC-3276, in the market.(here) The bench had refused to grant an interim injunction against Zydus’s launch because the Patentee had not mapped the product against their claims. As a result, the Court held, it could not arrive at a

ER Squibb to map Zydus’s product: Does this mean closure? Read More »

SC to decide CCI’s Jurisdiction over abuse of Patent Rights

Can CCI decide whether a patentee, in exercising his exclusive rights under the Patent Act, has violated the provisions of Competition Act, 2002? Readers of this blog must be aware how hotly contested this question is (here, here, here, here and here). From initially holding that CCI does have jurisdiction to investigate, a DHC DB had ultimately ousted CCI’s power to investigate abuse of patent rights. Last year, disposing of a SLP against the DB judgement, the SC had refused to decide the above issue since the parties had reached a

SC to decide CCI’s Jurisdiction over abuse of Patent Rights Read More »

‘Pro-tem’ FRAND Deposits: Are temporary orders here to stay?

The Indian jurisprudence on ‘pro-tem’ security deposits in FRAND trials has been twelve years in the making at the Delhi High Court. Full details of the contents of pro-tem orders have been frequently discussed on the blog, see here, here, here and here. In this post, I am concerned particularly with what justifications have been used by the court to develop its pro-tem jurisprudence – creative expansions of the SEP litigation strategy toolkit are welcome, but not at the cost

‘Pro-tem’ FRAND Deposits: Are temporary orders here to stay? Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 2 – February 8)

Into the second week of February, with formal comments from our bloggers on the DPIIT’s proposed “One Nation One License One Payment” framework for GenAI and Copyright. A post on an industrial drama written in 1847 bursting the myth of the free-market society, and another post on the recent concept note by the DPIIT proposing reforms to India’s design law. Case summaries and IP developments from the country and the globe in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 2 – February 8) Read More »

From the Archives: The Giant, the Dwarf and the Lawyer – An 1847 Trilogue!

(Disclaimer: Long post ahead, mostly a translated excerpt from an archive. But it might be engrossing, or so I hope.) Namaskar/Salam, If you remember, a few years ago (oh, ‘tis already a long ago …), Swaraj and I penned a series called IP Reveries, problematizing intellectual property rights, their theoretical justifications and history through a hypothetical classroom setting. Well … Guess what?  While rummaging through some 19th-century archives recently, I lit upon a text from 1847 carrying a similar thing!

From the Archives: The Giant, the Dwarf and the Lawyer – An 1847 Trilogue! Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 26 – February 1)

Entering February by announcing the second edition of the SpicyIP Summer School in 2026! A three part book review of “Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia“, edited by Dr. Pratyush Nath Upreti. Case summaries and IP developments from the country and the globe in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week Announcing the Second Edition of the SpicyIP Summer School (2026) After an incredible

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 26 – February 1) Read More »

(Part III) Book Review: Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia

Reviewing Part III of the book- “Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia”, edited by Dr. Pratyush Nath Upreti, Prof. Ishupal Singh Kang engages with how institutions, courts, and practices shape IP governance beyond doctrinal boundaries, bringing questions of gender, access, expertise, and social justice into the frame. Reading the chapters in conversation rather than isolation, Prof. Kang reflects on innovation-centric assumptions, the politics of IP expertise, and the role of South Asian historical narratives in re-imagining IP law and its

(Part III) Book Review: Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia Read More »

(Part II) Book Review: Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia

Continuing the discussion on the book- “Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia“, edited by Dr. Pratyush Nath Upreti, Akshat Agrawal reviews part II of the book (Intellectual Property Developments in South Asia) and examines how South Asian IP regimes are shaped and constrained by the imperative to align with TRIPS, often at a high developmental, cultural, and public-interest cost. Discussing the chapters focusing on Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, Akshat highlights how legal transplants, trade pressures, and local

(Part II) Book Review: Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia Read More »

(Part I) Book Review: Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia

“Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia“, edited by Dr. Pratyush Nath Upreti (Reader in Law at the School of Law, Queen’s University Belfast), is a timely and important intervention that brings together scholars from across the region to examine how IP law is shaped by local legal cultures, policy priorities, and socio-economic realities. Covering India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan, the book speaks directly to concerns at the heart of our readership and holds particular significance for us,

(Part I) Book Review: Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia Read More »

Scroll to Top