Royalties And Research: A Forgotten Faultline In Indian Copyright Law?

In light of the recent Sci-hub blocking order, Anushka Aggarwal looks at Sections 19(3) and 19A of the Copyright Act in the context of copyright assignment agreements that regulate academic publishing in India. Anushka is a fourth-year student at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. Royalties And Research: A Forgotten Faultline In Indian Copyright Law? By Anushka Aggarwal The recent controversy over access to academic materials in India has, unsurprisingly, sparked conversations about systemic barriers to knowledge. For […]

Royalties And Research: A Forgotten Faultline In Indian Copyright Law? Read More »

Breaking: DHC Dismisses Roche’s Appeal in the Risdiplam Case

In a huge development concerning the Risdiplam litigation saga, a division bench of the Delhi High Court has rejected the appeal against the order refusing to grant an interim injunction to Roche. Pronounced just a few mins ago, in the decision, J. Hari Shankar (for the bench) said that a credible challenge has been made on grounds listed in Section 64 (1)(f) against Roche’s patent and thus refused to interfere with the Single judge’s judgement. For the uninitiated, Section 64(1)(f)

Breaking: DHC Dismisses Roche’s Appeal in the Risdiplam Case Read More »

Pic of Murali Neelakantan and Sonisha Srinivasan chatting

Announcing SpicyIP TV! The SS Edition: Episode 1 with Mr Murali Neelakantan

A few months ago, in the green environs of the inaugural edition of the SpicyIP Summer School (held at the lovely campus of ECC, Whitefield, Bengaluru) , we had the golden chance to sit and engage with so many interesting, and interested, minds. As course-participants took the opportunity to sit back with many of the faculty and engage in hours of discussion about careers, life, law and more, we too took the opportunity to kickstart something we’ve been wanting to

Announcing SpicyIP TV! The SS Edition: Episode 1 with Mr Murali Neelakantan Read More »

FRANDship with Comparable Licenses: Confidentiality Club Constituted in Nokia v Asustek & Ors.

Image from here. In a recent order, the Delhi HC decided on the terms of the constitution of the Confidentiality Club in certain connected SEP suits. Confidentiality clubs, as agreed-upon mechanisms to restrict the dissemination of confidential documents and materials in certain suits to only the necessary personnel, do have their criticisms. For example, by restricting access to valuable information around standard “essential” patents, even though they are contained in different license agreements. In this way, confidentiality clubs can lead

FRANDship with Comparable Licenses: Confidentiality Club Constituted in Nokia v Asustek & Ors. Read More »

The 3(E)-3(D) Fumble: When Synergy Gets Lost in Application

On the CHC’s judgment clarifying the difference between the statutory filters under Sections 3(d) and 3(e), Srishti Gaur breaks down the Court’s findings and explains how this is not the first time that courts have faced confusion between the two provisions. Srishti is a third-year student at National Law University, Delhi. Her previous posts can be accessed here. The 3(E)-3(D) Fumble: When Synergy Gets Lost in Application By Srishti Gaur Sections 3(d) and 3(e) of the Patents Act, 1970 (henceforth “Act”)

The 3(E)-3(D) Fumble: When Synergy Gets Lost in Application Read More »

Not Every Shiny Idea Travels Well to be an Invention! Lessons from the Saint-Gobain Patent Battle

On the Delhi High Court’s decision rejecting Saint Gobain’s appeal against a rejection order, Srishti Gaur explains the Court’s rationale on non-obviousness and novelty, and highlights why the Court was right in rejecting the argument for granting a patent merely because it had been granted by a foreign jurisdiction. Srishti is a third-year student at National Law University, Delhi. Her previous posts can be accessed here. Not Every Shiny Idea Travels Well to be an Invention! Lessons from the Saint-Gobain

Not Every Shiny Idea Travels Well to be an Invention! Lessons from the Saint-Gobain Patent Battle Read More »

GUI and IP: Here, There and Everywhere!

Image from here The Calcutta High Court (CalHC) seems poised to resolve the issue of registrability of GUI under the Designs Act (Act) once and for all. In a recent order in Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH v. Controller of Patents (Erbe, IPDAID/22/2024), CalHC has appointed Adv. Adarsh Ramanujan as amicus curiae to assist the Court on a matter, which seems to involve questions on the registrability of GUI under the Designs Act (See Adarsh’s post). This comes at a time when

GUI and IP: Here, There and Everywhere! Read More »

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (06.10.2025)

Hello and welcome back to Bells & Whistles!I hope you had a joyful Dussehra and Durga Pooja break. As we all settle back into work, I’m kicking off something new — a featured listing “Bell of the Week” each week, where I’ll spotlight a tool, event, or resource in the IP and legal world that caught my eye. BELL OF THE WEEK! This week, I’m featuring IndianKanoon, a free legal search engine created by Sushant Sinha in 2008. What started as a personal initiative

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (06.10.2025) Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 29-October 5)

CGPDTM’s list of scientific advisers and DHC’s decision on “use of a mark” in a trademark infringement case concerning Princeton University and a regular roundup of free or low-cost IP events, along with fellowships, jobs, and scholarships that we think might be useful. This and much more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Rapunzel, Rapunzel, lay down your “lists”: CGPDTM updates the Roll of Scientific Advisers 

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 29-October 5) Read More »

Rapunzel, Rapunzel, lay down your “lists”: CGPDTM updates the Roll of Scientific Advisers 

 Image generated by ChatGPT-5 On the 4th of September, 2025, the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM) released the updated Roll of Scientific Advisers on the IPIndia website. (See here). In April, 2025, Advika discussed the release of the public notice inviting applications to update the roll of Scientific Advisors, maintained as per Rule 103 of the Patents Rules, 2003. This roll has to be updated every year.   This roll is not just an

Rapunzel, Rapunzel, lay down your “lists”: CGPDTM updates the Roll of Scientific Advisers  Read More »

Scroll to Top