Novenco v. Xero: Do IP Cases Get a Free Pass to Bypass Sec 12-A? 

/ By / Design, Overlaps in IP, Patent, Trademark

The recent decision of the SC in Novenco Building and Industry v. Xero Energy Engineering seems to have been well taken. Comments online have showered praised over the decision for striking the right balance between procedural lapse and substantive justice. Writing on this blog for over 2 years now, I have learnt one important lesson- the outcome must never shift one’s focus away from the reasoning.  To gauge how much off the mark reasoning in this judgement was, please read this- “the public […]

Novenco v. Xero: Do IP Cases Get a Free Pass to Bypass Sec 12-A?  Read More »

Atomberg v. Eureka Forbes : Section 106 Steps Out of the Shadows

/ By / Patent

In Atomberg v. Eureka Forbes, the Supreme Court clarified a small but significant corner of Indian patent law. The Court recognised that suits against groundless threats of infringement have their own independent footing under Section 106 of the Patents Act – and aren’t automatically overridden by an infringement action. Hafsah Azhar Ansari breaks down the Court’s judgement and explains its significance. Hafsah is a third-year student at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. Atomberg v. Eureka Forbes : Section 106 Steps Out

Atomberg v. Eureka Forbes : Section 106 Steps Out of the Shadows Read More »

Let’s IPsa Loquitur: The Personality Rights Debacle – Whose Face Value Is It Anyway?

/ By / Copyright, Overlaps in IP, Podcast, Privacy

Regular readers (and now, viewers!) would’ve seen the launch of our SpicyIP TV series with the Summer School edition, where we spoke with many of the fantastic faculty members who had come to generously spend their time with our summer school students. That series (still on-going, with more to come), is geared especially towards those who are interested in the state of legal education as well as various ways of approaching how to build one’s career in IP and related

Let’s IPsa Loquitur: The Personality Rights Debacle – Whose Face Value Is It Anyway? Read More »

Announcing 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025 by SpicyIP and CIPAM, DPIIT

/ By / Drug Regulation, Opportunities, Patent, Trade Secret

Kickstarting November with some good news for young IP policy enthusiasts, we are elated to announce the 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025! This exciting competition aims to encourage students to look beyond textbooks and statutory provisions, and to explore the dynamic relationship between intellectual property, innovation, and societal progress. By engaging with contemporary IP issues that shape India’s legal and creative ecosystem, the competition seeks to foster critical thinking and contribute meaningfully to the

Announcing 1st National Policy Brief Competition on Intellectual Property & Innovation 2025 by SpicyIP and CIPAM, DPIIT Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (October 27 – November 2)

/ By / Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

Delhi HC delivers first-ever SEP non-infringement ruling, on a long-forgotten VCD patent and Delhi HC’s Justice Prathiba M. SIngh appointed Chair of WIPO’s Advisory Board of Judges. Don’t forget – SpicyIP TV Podcast episode 8 with Mr. Nikhil Narendran is now out! This and much more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know.  Highlights of the Week The Tech is Dead, Long Live the Tech: Lessons in

SpicyIP Weekly Review (October 27 – November 2) Read More »

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (03.11.2025)

/ By / Courses & Workshops, Opportunities

Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles!In case you have missed out on the new development on SpicyIP TV (our YouTube channel) – here’s the teaser! It is a new place on the channel by the name “Lets IPsa Loquitur” for experts and bloggers to converse. Stay tuned for the release of the 1st episode on the buzz around personality rights. BELL OF THE WEEK – Remembering Rahul Cherian Some Bells don’t just chime — they continue to resonate

SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (03.11.2025) Read More »

https://assets.medpagetoday.net/media/devqa/images/80xxx/80938.jpg

Novartis’s Heartache over Entresto: An Analysis of the Controller’s Patent Revocation Decision

/ By / Patent

[The post is co-authored with Vikram Raj Nanda. A big thanks to Swaraj and Praharsh for their inputs.] In a detailed 262-page order (pdf) dated 12th September, 2025, Dr Usha Rao, the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, annulled Novartis’ patent over its cardiac drug ‘Vymada’ (marketed internationally as ‘Entresto’). The Controller had cumulatively dealt with several post-grant oppositions that had been filed by the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance, along with two firms: IPCA (Indian Pharmaceutical Combine Association) Laboratories and MicroLabs. 

Novartis’s Heartache over Entresto: An Analysis of the Controller’s Patent Revocation Decision Read More »

The SpicyIP TV Podcast SS Edn: Ep 08 with Mr. Nikhil Narendran

/ By / Others, Podcast

In the 8th episode of the SpicyIP Podcast Summer School Edition, it was an honour to speak with Mr. Nikhil Narendran, Partner at Trilegal, where he leads one of the top  Technology, Media and Telecom(TMT) teams in the country. During his brief time with us at the Summer School, his session on AI and Copyright, along with his expertise in law and technology sparked a lively discussion where the class was able to present informed arguments and bring divergent perspectives. 

The SpicyIP TV Podcast SS Edn: Ep 08 with Mr. Nikhil Narendran Read More »

Justice Prathiba M. Singh appointed Chair of WIPO’s ABJ!

/ By / Others

On 20th October, Justice Prathiba M. Singh of the Delhi High Court was appointed as the Chair of the 10-member Advisory Board of Judges (‘ABJ’) of the World Intellectual Property Organization(‘WIPO’). Justice Singh’s tenure is supposed to last for two years (2025-27) where she will be serving as in her personal capacity and not as a representative of India.  According to WIPO website, the ABJ plays a key role in advising and guiding WIPO’s Judicial Institute. It is not an adjudicatory body bur rather an advisory body to help WIPO in building consistency and

Justice Prathiba M. Singh appointed Chair of WIPO’s ABJ! Read More »

The Tech is Dead, Long Live the Tech: Lessons in Indian SEP Litigation from Philips v. Bathla

/ By / Patent

On October 13, 2025, the Delhi High Court concluded a 21-year long patent dispute to give its first standard essential patent (SEP) non-infringement decision. In this judgment, the Court has ruled on patent infringement, discussed the impleadment of third-parties, identification of type of patent, requisites for claim mapping, effective use of evidence, and presentation of SEP essentiality. Interestingly the essentiality of the SEP was not framed as an issue in the suit, but the Court considered it on ‘vehement submissions’

The Tech is Dead, Long Live the Tech: Lessons in Indian SEP Litigation from Philips v. Bathla Read More »

Scroll to Top