Copyright

Breaking News: OUP and other Publishers Withdraw Copyright Suit Against Delhi University and Photocopier


In a stunning development, OUP, CUP and Taylor & Francis just withdrew their copyright law suit filed against Delhi University (and its photocopier, Rameshwari) 5 years ago! They indicated this to the Delhi high court in a short and succinct filing made this morning. This withdrawal brings to an end one of the most hotly contested IP battles ever, pitting as it did multinational publishers against academics and students. The law suit was filed as far back as 2012 and…


Read More »
Events

SpicyIP Events: International Conference on the TRIPS CBD Linkage: Issues and Way Forward


We are pleased to announce that the Centre for WTO Studies, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi is organising an International Conference on the TRIPS CBD Linkage: Issues and Way Forward. The Conference will be held on March 15-17, 2017 at the Conference Hall, IInd Floor, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi. The draft agenda for the Conference can be viewed here.


Read More »
Copyright

Interim Injunction Against Thomson Reuters Confirmed on Same Terms as SC’s Reed Elseiver Order


The Allahabad High Court has, on appeal, confirmed the interim injunction granted against Thomson Reuters in a suit by Eastern Book Company (EBC) for copyright infringement, on the same terms as the one granted to EBC against Reed Elseiver. As we had reported here, Supreme Court had confirmed the interim injunction granted to EBC for alleged infringement of its copyright by Reed Elseiver over the copyedited and modified judgments, and had also remitted the matter back to the trial court…


Read More »
Geographical Indication Innovation Others Patent

SpicyIP Fellowship 2017-18: Where are the Women in IPR? Still a Long Way to Go


  On the occasion of International Women’s Day, we are pleased to bring to you a guest post on gender and IP by our Fellowship applicant, Afreen Hashmi. This is her first submission for the Fellowship. Our earlier posts on this theme can be viewed here and here. Where are the Women in IPR? Still a Long Way to Go Afreen Hashmi James Watt invented steam engines, Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone, the Wright Brothers invented aeroplane; whereas Thomas Edison…


Read More »
Patent

Del HC Allows Natco to Export Bayer’s Nexavar under the Bolar Exemption


In a significant development today, Justice Endlaw of the Delhi High Court held that ‘export’ of a patented invention for experimental purposes is also covered under Section 107A of the Patents Act, 1970 (India’s Bolar exemption) and thus does not amount to patent infringement. It accordingly allowed Natco to export Bayer’s patented drug ‘Sorafenib Tosylate’ (for which it was granted a compulsory license in 2012) to China for the purpose of conducting development/ clinical studies and trials. It rejected Bayer’s…


Read More »
Competition Law Patent

Charging for Expired Patents: The How and Why the Practice Should Stop


This is a continuation of my previous post where I had briefly referred to charging for expired patents.  This post goes in greater detail in the issue. If I were to summarize this post, it would be: Portfolio licensing and FRAND commitments do not go together.  This post also highlights why it is important to keep the historical context in mind while dealing with 20 year monopolies as those of us who forget history are condemned to repeat it. A…


Read More »
Trademark

Bombay HC Full Bench Rules on the Interplay Between Sections 29(4) and 29(5) of the TM Act – Part I


A Full Bench of the Bombay High Court, consisting of Justices A.S. Oka, A.A. Sayed and A.S. Gadkari pronounced their decision in the matter of Cipla Limited v. M/s Cipla Indsutries Pvt. Ltd. on March 1, 2017 (read the order here). This decision is of extreme importance as the Honourable Chief Justice directed that the matter be placed before a Full Bench, following Justice Patel’s recommendation that the 2010 Division Bench (‘DB’) Decision in Raymond Limited v. Raymond Pharmaceuticals (‘Raymond’)…


Read More »
Trademark

Bombay HC Full Bench Rules on the Interplay Between Sections 29(4) and 29(5) of the TM Act – Part II


While Part I was concerned with the background to this dispute, this post concentrates on the reasoning of the Full Bench, as well as analyses its jurisprudential impact. Holding of the Court The Court held that the plain language used in sub-sections (4) and (5) answered the questions at hand. It was noted that 29(4) uses the words “in the course of trade” and “in relation to goods and services” which were absent in 29(5). Conversely, “as his trade name…


Read More »
Designs

In a Welcome Development, Delhi High Court Refuses to Compel Intermediaries to Screen Content Violative of Intellectual Property Laws on an Ex-ante Basis


One issue that has received sustained attention on this Blog has been the determination of the width and amplitude of the responsibility of intermediaries for the removal of content that is violative of intellectual property laws. In this respect, we have covered such diverse issues as the implications of the Viacom versus YouTube decision on intermediary liability see [here and here]; the implications of the Shreya Singal judgment [see here]; the need for the extant legal framework to be overhauled…


Read More »
Events Sponsored

SpicyIP Events: 4th WTI – CWS Joint Academy on International Trade and Policy


We are happy to announce that The World Trade Institute of the University of Bern, Switzerland and the Centre for WTO Studies, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, India will be conducting the 4th WTI – CWS Joint Academy on International Trade Law and Policy (“Joint Academy”), from June 5– June 30, 2017 in New Delhi. The last date for submission of applications is March 31, 2017. For further details, please read the Call for Applications below. 4th WTI – CWS JOINT ACADEMY…


Read More »