GCIP Day 1 Session 2: Perspectives from Developing Countries

This post is part of SpicyIP’s coverage of the Fourth Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest. The second session of Day 1 featured some extremely fascinating insights from across the developing world, adding fresh glosses to familiar themes in some cases, as well as radical new ideas from the bottom up in others. First up was Prof. Anil Gupta, co-ordinator of the path-breaking Honey Bee Network, which aims to connect small innovators (who seem to be all-pervasive […]

GCIP Day 1 Session 2: Perspectives from Developing Countries Read More »

GCIP2015: Notes from the Inaugural Session

The 2015 Global Congress on IP and the Public Interest kicked off with its inaugural plenary session, on 14th December, 2015. With over 400 registered participants, ranging from established academics to activists to students gathered in the auditorium in National Law University, Delhi, Phet Sayo, a Senior Fellow at IDRC and a panelist at the session rightly observed that if a bomb were to go off at this venue, “there goes IP activism”.  The inaugural  session began with Dr. Ranbir

GCIP2015: Notes from the Inaugural Session Read More »

GCIP2015: Leading Up To The GCIP: A Chat With Jayashree Watal

This post by Job Michael Mathew first appeared on the Global Congress 2015 Blog. The fifth discussion in our pre-GCIP discussion series is with Jayashree Watal.[1] Profile: Jayashree Watal has been Counsellor in the Intellectual Property Division of the World Trade Organization since February 2001. She worked in the Ministry of Commerce of the Government of India as Director, Trade Policy Division, New Delhi (1995–1998). She represented India at a crucial stage in the Uruguay Round TRIPS negotiations from 1989–1990.

GCIP2015: Leading Up To The GCIP: A Chat With Jayashree Watal Read More »

Guest Post: Inherent Conflict of the Draft TM Rules with Parent Act

We are happy to bring you a guest post from Jasneet Kaur. Jasneet is an independent legal practitioner with extensive experience in trade mark law, having worked with the IPR divisions of two leading law firms in Delhi. In this post she points out some conflicts in the newly issued Draft Rules (that we had blogged about here) and suggests some ways to resolve these conflicts. Inherent Conflict of the Draft TM Rules with Parent Act Jasneet Kaur This post

Guest Post: Inherent Conflict of the Draft TM Rules with Parent Act Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (30th November – 12th December)

SpicyIP Highlight of the Week(s)! Our SpicyIP Highlight was definitely Shamnad sir’s article where he applauded Justice Nadrajog and Justice Gupta of the Delhi High Court for having issued a suo moto order accepting the allegations of plagiarism against them in the Roche v. Cipla judgement. In the order, they went on to apologize to the authors of the 2013 note published in the Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property – Shwetasree Majumdar and Eashan Ghosh – from where the plagiarized

SpicyIP Weekly Review (30th November – 12th December) Read More »

VPATAPP, an app for patent practitioners

Earlier this year, a team of four Indian IP enthusiasts led by Vijaykumar Shivpuje, launched the first version of an interesting Android application titled ‘VPATAPP’. VPATAPP is a free resource which provides a quick toolkit for various categorised sources aimed at IPR practitioners, specifically patent lawyers, across the globe. The app has just been upgraded to its second version on 13th December, adding crucial features. VPATAPP is a repository of patent-related links and information from around the world, including, as

VPATAPP, an app for patent practitioners Read More »

Transfer of IPR cases stayed by the Delhi High Court

Two writ petitions (filed by Vifor International Limited and Asian Patent Association (Indian Group) have been filed against the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court’s order dated 24.11.2015 with effect from 26.10.2015. On December 3, 2015 a division bench of the Delhi High Court held that the proviso to section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Divisions and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Ordinance, 2015 (“Commercial Courts Ordinance/Ordinance”) requires consideration but until the next date of hearing (January

Transfer of IPR cases stayed by the Delhi High Court Read More »

GCIP2015: Leading Up To The GCIP: A Chat With Shamnad Basheer

This post by Job Michael Mathew first appeared on the Global Congress 2015 Blog. The next discussion in our pre-GCIP discussion series is with Prof. Shamnad Basheer.[1] Profile: Shamnad Basheer is the founder of SpicyIP, India’s premier blog on IP and innovation law and policy. Basheer was the first Ministry of Human Resource Development Chaired Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, and a Frank H. Marks Visiting Associate Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the George Washington

GCIP2015: Leading Up To The GCIP: A Chat With Shamnad Basheer Read More »

Let the judges judge!

As we had reported a while back, the recent Roche v. Cipla judgement from the Delhi High Court seems to have been plagiarised in part from an academic article. The Division Bench that authored this judgement was bold enough to own up to this error and in a suo moto order apologised to the authors and modified their judgement to remove this plagiarised content. Prof. Shamnad, while reporting on this order lauded the Bench for their courage. Justice Ruma Pal,

Let the judges judge! Read More »

Supreme Court says NO: Trademark registration for names of holy books

In the present case (Civil Appeal No. 2138 of 2006, Supreme Court), the appellant had applied for registration of the mark “Ramayan” with the device of a crown in relation to incense sticks and perfumeries (class 3). This application was challenged by the respondent whose main contention was that since the mark was a name of a religious book, no single trader could claim exclusivity over it. The Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks had held that this mark was capable of distinguishing

Supreme Court says NO: Trademark registration for names of holy books Read More »

Scroll to Top