Seeing Red, Silencing Truth: The Theft and Caste-Washing of ‘Sevvarali Poocharam’

On the Sevvarali Poocharam plagiarism, misrepresentation allegations, Anjali Tripathi writes on appropriation and whether the Indian copyright and other IP laws are equipped to handle such sensitive cases alleging caste based appropriation. Anjali is a fourth-year law student at JGLS with an interest in IP rights, access to education, and the creative arts. Her previous posts can be accessed here. Seeing Red, Silencing Truth: The Theft and Caste-Washing of ‘Sevvarali Poocharam’ By Anjali Tripathi Imagine working for years on something […]

Seeing Red, Silencing Truth: The Theft and Caste-Washing of ‘Sevvarali Poocharam’ Read More »

SpicyIP Tidbit: No Work, No Relief? Re-examining the Non-Working of Patents as a Ground to Deny an ad Interim Injunction

[This post is authored by Neha Srikanth. Neha is a fourth-year law student at the School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University) Bangalore. She is interested in IPR & TMT Laws.] In Conqueror Innovations v. Xiaomi, the Delhi High Court (“DHC”) recently rejected the application for an interim injunction in a patent dispute. In doing so, the Court held that Conqueror Innovations had failed to establish a prima facie case of infringement through their claim mapping. However, interestingly, the Court

SpicyIP Tidbit: No Work, No Relief? Re-examining the Non-Working of Patents as a Ground to Deny an ad Interim Injunction Read More »

Holes in Reasoning? How the Judgement in Crocs v Bata Might be Misunderstood

Taking forward the discussion on the Delhi High Court’s recent Crocs US v. Bata judgment, Priyam Mitra highlights how the Court might not have confused the concepts of design and trade dress. Priyam is a 3rd year student at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. He is interested in contemporary discussions surrounding intellectual property and criminal law.  Holes in Reasoning? How the Judgement in Crocs v Bata Might be Misunderstood By Priyam Mitra A division bench of the Delhi High

Holes in Reasoning? How the Judgement in Crocs v Bata Might be Misunderstood Read More »

The Knowledge Gap in Action: Newgen v. VCare and the Realities of Modern Contracting

Discussing the recent Delhi High Court decision in Newgen v. VCare, Yohann Titus Mathew analyzes the order through the lens of Mateusz Grochowski’s paper- Knowledge Gap in Contract Law, to explain why modern contracts must be drafted keeping today’s fast-paced economy in mind. Yohann is a fourth-year B.Sc. LL.B. (Hons.) [Cyber Security] student at the National Law Institute University, Bhopal. He is interested in a wide range of law, spanning corporate law, data protection, intermediary liability, and intellectual property. He’s especially

The Knowledge Gap in Action: Newgen v. VCare and the Realities of Modern Contracting Read More »

Suitcases v Shoes: Who Really Owns Carlton?

Recently, the DHC in VIP v. Carlton has held that in passing off cases, the goodwill of a mark abroad will be irrelevant unless accompanied by evidence of its goodwill in India. Analysing the judgement, Shailraj Jhalnia explains the international jurisprudence on goodwill and some of the issues that may arise due to this judgement. Shailraj is a third year law student pursuing B.A. LL.B. from National Law School of India University, Bangalore, with a keen interest in IP Law,

Suitcases v Shoes: Who Really Owns Carlton? Read More »

What the India–UK Free Trade Agreement Means for GRATK Protection: A Missed Opportunity?

In light of the recently concluded India-UK CETA, Achyuth B Nandan critically examines how far the FTA accommodates the protection of Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge (GRATK). Achyuth is a PhD candidate at Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur, specialising in intellectual property law. He is also a registered advocate with the Bar Council of Kerala. His previous posts can be accessed here. What the India–UK Free Trade Agreement Means for GRATK Protection: A Missed Opportunity? Achyuth

What the India–UK Free Trade Agreement Means for GRATK Protection: A Missed Opportunity? Read More »

From the Archives: India’s (not so) Secret Breakup Letters to the Berne Convention

Hello, Today, I got you two exciting archival documents regarding the Berne Convention, specifically the time when India was on the verge of denouncing it.  But here’s the context first … Some of our readers might already be familiar with the twists and turns of Indian copyright history—or may have read the exciting account by Prashant and Sumathi, which tells the story of India’s engagement with the Berne Convention. This multilateral treaty, first adopted in 1886, is considered the beginning

From the Archives: India’s (not so) Secret Breakup Letters to the Berne Convention Read More »

CRI Guidelines 2025 released!: Same Bottle, Same Wine?

The CGPDTM released the much-awaited CRI Guidelines 2025 today evening. The previous version of these guidelines were released in 2013, 2015, 2016 and 2017. (2015 guidelines were scrapped after criticism) On a first look, its heartening to see that the released guidelines are replete with illustrative examples. This will help the examiners to apply the law although the jurisprudence on the law has been questionable. The Public notice of IPO also mentions that comments received for version 2.0 as well as feedback received in in-stakeholder meeting will be released soon.

CRI Guidelines 2025 released!: Same Bottle, Same Wine? Read More »

Call for Submission RSRR – Ahlawat & Associates Blog Series (Submissions by August 20, 2025)

RGNUL Student Research Review is inviting submissions for RSRR – Ahlawat & Associates Blog Series. The last day for submission is August 20, 2025 11:59 PM (IST). Read on below for their call for submissions. Call for Submission RSRR – Ahlawat & Associates Blog Series (Submissions by August 20, 2025) The RGNUL Student Research Review (RSRR) is the flagship student-run, double-blind peer reviewed journal of the Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab. Established in 2013, RSRR has been driven

Call for Submission RSRR – Ahlawat & Associates Blog Series (Submissions by August 20, 2025) Read More »

Device Found, but Not a Case of Patent Infringement: Examining the Order in Conqueror Innovations v Xiaomi

Many of the readers who own a Xiaomi device would be familiar with the company’s ‘Find Device’ feature that allows users to perform features on their phone remotely, including the ability to track, lock or even erase data from it. This functionality was at the centre of an important order recently where the Delhi HC refused to issue an interim injunction against Xiaomi from using its ‘Find Device’ feature on the allegations of patent infringement raised by the plaintiff, a

Device Found, but Not a Case of Patent Infringement: Examining the Order in Conqueror Innovations v Xiaomi Read More »

Scroll to Top