FICCI announces online certificate course on Competition law and IPR

  Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) has started an Online Certificate Course on Competition Law & Intellectual Property Rights (IPComp).  The objective of the Course is to make students and professionals learn about complex international legal environment in which multinational corporations and businesses operate. Through several case studies, the course introduces some practical legal concepts, pitfalls and compliance  issues that are needed by today’s businesses to comply with Competition Law, IPRs and their legal linkage. This advance […]

FICCI announces online certificate course on Competition law and IPR Read More »

Guest Post: The Unfair Competition Act, 2011 and its Implications on Indian Manufacturers

In yet another interesting submission to our SpicyIP Fellowship applicant series, L. Gopika Murthy, a 2nd year student at NLSIU, Bangalore sends us this well written post on a new IT specific competition legislation being implemented in USA and the implications it may have on Indian software manufacturers.  The Unfair Competition Act, 2011 and its Implications on Indian Manufacturers The Unfair Competition Act, 2011[1]is a statue that aims to deter unfair competition by penalizing manufacturers who use stolen Information Technology

Guest Post: The Unfair Competition Act, 2011 and its Implications on Indian Manufacturers Read More »

Spicy IP Weekly Review: December Week 4

Image from here   This week has understandably been a little slow in terms of the posts, given most of the team are busy just like the readers to celebrate the end of yet another eventful year. Prashant started it off with the announcement of a taxation law conference jointly hosted by NLSIU, Bangalore and Tax India Online, due to be held on January 6, 2013 at Bangalore, which will be focusing on the developments since the proposed introduction of

Spicy IP Weekly Review: December Week 4 Read More »

Patent Office grants Polymorph Patent after rejecting S.3(d) Objection

Image from here In a rather interesting turn of events, the Indian Patent Office has recently granted patent for the polymorph of a known compound, notwithstanding objections u/s. 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970. Following are the details of the judgment: Application Number: 106/DELNP/2008 Applicant’s Name: M/S ALFA WASSERMANN S.P.A., Italy. Date of Decision: December 26, 2012. Controller’s Name: Hardev Karar, Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, Patent Office, New Delhi. Facts: The application was filed for “POLYMORPHIC FORMS OF

Patent Office grants Polymorph Patent after rejecting S.3(d) Objection Read More »

Guest Post: Pharma patent developments in 2012 – A review

As 2012 draws to a close, Madhulika Vishwanathan brings us a concise review of the year that was, for the Indian pharmaceutical landscape. Madhulika is a qualified patent agent, with a Masters in Pharmacology from UDCT, Mumbai. She has previously worked in the patent cell of a Mumbai based biotech company. This is Madhulika’s second post in our SpicyIP Fellowship application series. Her previous post is available here.  Year 2012 in retrospection: Cases which changed the Indian pharmaceutical patent landscape As

Guest Post: Pharma patent developments in 2012 – A review Read More »

The IPO’s draft guidelines for biotechnology patents – A cause for worry?

Image from here Close on the heels of finalizing the guidelines for examination of patent applications related to traditional knowledge (TK) and biological materials, the Controller General of Patents has recently published guidelines for the examination of ‘biotechnology patents’. The guidelines can be accessed over here and the public notice can be accessed over here. Comments on the same are due by the 11thof January, 2013. I invite our readers to send in guest posts on the issue, to be

The IPO’s draft guidelines for biotechnology patents – A cause for worry? Read More »

Off-topic: Lowering the Bar at the Delhi High Court

Image from here Usually, I try to keep away ‘off-topic’ issues on the blog but some of the recent events at the Delhi High Court, involving the boycott of Justice Valmiki Mehta are simply too shocking to ignore and I felt compelled to discuss the issue on the blog. Apparently, upset with the way in which Justice Valmiki Mehta was running his court room, the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) resolved through its executive committee that “members of the

Off-topic: Lowering the Bar at the Delhi High Court Read More »

SpicyIP Events: The First NLS-TIOL Taxation Law Conference

  The Moot Court Society of National Law School of India University, Bangalore, in association with Tax India Online, is organising the 1stNLS-TIOL Taxation Law Conference on 6th January, 2013 along with the NLS TIOL Moot Court Competition. The Conference seeks to trace out the developments since the proposed introduction of General Anti-Avoidance Rule in the Finance Act, 2012. While the Shome Committee has made certain recommendations that provide clarity with respect to the application of GAAR, some recommendations are

SpicyIP Events: The First NLS-TIOL Taxation Law Conference Read More »

Spicy IP Weekly Review: December Weeks 2 and 3

For the readers of Spicy IP, we bring yet another sum-up of IP news and events in the past few days to mark the festive season. It started with Rajiv coming up with the list of the 102 decisions that the Controller’s Office has come up with in November, 2012.   Image from here This was followed by a guest post from Snigdha Roy, a 3rd Year student from GNLU, as the first installment in the Spicy IP Fellowship post-series.

Spicy IP Weekly Review: December Weeks 2 and 3 Read More »

Filing rectification application under the GI Act, 1999

[*Long Post] As you are aware of, rectification application can be filed under Section 27 of Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (“GI Act”). I intend to examine whether the aforesaid provision allows filing of rectification application on the ground of public interest. I shall argue in affirmative relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Hardie Trading Ltd. and Anr. v. Addisons Paint and Chemicals Ltd. (“Hardie Trading Ltd”) and IPAB order in Payyannur ring [covered here]. Prashant

Filing rectification application under the GI Act, 1999 Read More »

Scroll to Top