SpicyIP Tidbit: Fair Dealing or Foul Play? Copyright Claims in An IPL Breakfast Show

/ By / Copyright, Trademark

[This post is authored by SpicyIP intern Sonisha Srinivasan. Sonisha is a 4th year law student at School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be) University, Bangalore. She is keenly interested in Research, Intellectual property Law, and Media and Entertainment Law.] When “Cricket” meets “Copyright”, sometimes even “Breakfast [podcast] shows” are bowled out. This is in the context of an interesting dispute that involves “The Grade Cricketer” podcast hosted by Sam Perry and Ian Higgins, which had been running a show […]

SpicyIP Tidbit: Fair Dealing or Foul Play? Copyright Claims in An IPL Breakfast Show Read More »

Comments Invited for Draft Guidelines on Similar Biologics

/ By / Drug Regulation

On May 6, the Central Drug Standard Control Organization published the draft version of the Revised Guidelines on Similar Biologics, inviting comments from the concerned stakeholders. These guidelines were prepared after a Committee composed of technical subject experts, representatives from the National Institute of Biologics, Dept. of Biotechnology, and representatives from industries manufacturing similar biologics. As explained in the introductory pages, the guidelines are revised in light of advances in scientific knowledge and to update the existing guidelines in light

Comments Invited for Draft Guidelines on Similar Biologics Read More »

Image of the flowchart showing the various technical tests used in interpreting S.3(k). Accessible version within the post below.

The State of CRI Jurisprudence in India – “Technically” All Over the Place

/ By / Patent

Some years ago, I had traced out two decades of the ‘confusingly confounding’ regulation of software patents in India. The “ping-ponging” journey traced in that post seems to have been a precursor for the judicial fragmentation that Section 3(k)’s interpretation would soon see. Last week, as a few of us (Bharathwaj Ramakrishnan, Yogesh Byadwal, Anushka Dhankar and myself) were putting together comments for the 2025 Draft Computer Related Inventions (CRI) Guidelines and after some grueling work going through as many

The State of CRI Jurisprudence in India – “Technically” All Over the Place Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 28 – May 4)

/ By / Biological Diversity, Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

Entering May with posts on the copyright battle between musical maestros AR Rahman and Ustad F W Dagar, USTR 301 Annual Report that keeps India on ‘Priority Watch List’, settlement in the Philips-Vivo SEP showdown, and the Cryogas v. Inox judgment that misses the Section 52(1)(w) mark. Not to forget – we have begun revealing our faculty and experts for the SpicyIP Summer School. More on this here. Here’s a roundup of our blog posts, case summaries and top IP

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 28 – May 4) Read More »

Dagar v. A R Rahman Controversy: Is the Law Out of Tune with Indian Classical Music?

/ By / Copyright

In a copyright battle between two musical maestros, the Delhi High Court, in an interim order, held that the song ‘Veera Raja Veera’ from Ponniyin Selvan 2 prima facie infringed the copyright of Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar’s musical composition ‘Shiva Stuti’. The film song was composed by ace musical composer A. R. Rahman. In this post, Varsha Jhavar breaks down the Court’s prima facie finding on similarity between the two competing works and infringement, noting several critiques in the Court’s

Dagar v. A R Rahman Controversy: Is the Law Out of Tune with Indian Classical Music? Read More »

SpicyIP Tidbit: The Philips-Vivo SEP Showdown: How a High-Stakes SEP Battle Ended in Settlement

/ By / Patent

[This post is authored by SpicyIP intern Sushant Jaiswal. Sushant is a third-year law student at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, with a keen interest in intellectual property law and legal research.] In a recent turn of events, Koninklijke Philips N.V. and Vivo Mobile Communication Co. Ltd. decided to settle their 5-year-old SEP dispute over 3G and 4G technologies. The two sides confirmed before Justice Amit Bansal of the Delhi High Court that they had entered into

SpicyIP Tidbit: The Philips-Vivo SEP Showdown: How a High-Stakes SEP Battle Ended in Settlement Read More »

Why Should the U.S. Have All the Fun? India Must Consider Publishing a Biopiracy Watch List

/ By / Biological Diversity

In light of India featuring (again) in the “Priority Watch List” of the 2025 USTR Special 301 Report, Dr. Anson CJ explores the idea of whether India should come up with its own watch list to monitor biopiracy? Dr. Anson is an Assistant Professor at Madras Christian College, Chennai. His previous post can be accessed here. Why Should the U.S. Have All the Fun? India Must Consider Publishing a Biopiracy Watch List By Dr. Anson C J Each year, the

Why Should the U.S. Have All the Fun? India Must Consider Publishing a Biopiracy Watch List Read More »

Assessing the Cryogas Judgment from the lens of Section 52(1)(w)

/ By / Copyright, Design

Highlighting the missed opportunity to interpret Section 52(1)(w) of the Copyright Act in Cryogas Equipment Private Limited v. Inox India Limited and Others, SpicyIP intern Advika Singh Malik writes on whether the provision could have been roped in by the parties in the present case or not. Advika is a third-year law student at Symbiosis Law School, Noida. She is interested in pursuing IP and tech litigation. Her previous posts can be accessed here. Assessing the Cryogas Judgment from the

Assessing the Cryogas Judgment from the lens of Section 52(1)(w) Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 21 – April 27)

/ By / Copyright, Others, Patent, Trademark

A reminder on the SpicyIP Summer School, applications for which are now open! Some anomalies in the Patent Agent exam results, a twist in the PPL-Azure case before the Supreme Court, Kerala’s new IPR and TK Policy draft, and a lot more that has happened in the last week. Add to that – an upcoming post on the big Ustad FW Dagar vs. AR Rahman judgment from the Delhi High Court. Here’s a roundup of our blog posts, case summaries

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 21 – April 27) Read More »

Strengthening Innovation: Kerala’s Vision for IPR and TK

/ By / Innovation, Patent, Traditional Knowledge

Recently, a committee to revise Kerala’s 2008 IP and TK policy was formulated. The Committee will work on the draft 2025 policy and revise the policy for the state after 17 years. Looking at the draft version of the 2025 Policy, SpicyIP Intern Advika Singh Malik highlights its key recommendations and compares it with the previous policy from 2008. Advika is a third-year law student at Symbiosis Law School, Noida. She is interested in pursuing IP and tech litigation. Her

Strengthening Innovation: Kerala’s Vision for IPR and TK Read More »

Scroll to Top