New Age Office? CGPDTM To Move from Mumbai to Delhi 

After a furor on social media platforms, the Commerce Minister has clarified that the seat of the CGPDTM is being shifted from Mumbai to New Delhi. After the move, the Mumbai office will still have the existing regional trademark and patent offices. Leaving the political banter behind this announcement aside, it is worrisome that such important announcements are made over social media platforms instead of the official website. The document about this move, which is being flouted around in social […]

New Age Office? CGPDTM To Move from Mumbai to Delhi  Read More »

https://i.imgflip.com/9jf0c7.jpg

Blowing Hot and Cold: DHC’s Observations on Commercialisation when Raising the Section 107A Exemption

[A big thanks to Swaraj and Praharsh for their inputs] On February 4, 2024, the Delhi High Court, in Incyte Holdings Corporation & Ors. v. Granules India Limited  (pdf), recorded a settlement in a patent dispute concerning Ruxolitinob, a drug used to manage myelofibrosis, a rare bone marrow disorder. The settlement was reached after Granules’ assurance that its activities were not for commercial use of the drugs and were covered under the Bolar type research exemption under Section 107A (for

Blowing Hot and Cold: DHC’s Observations on Commercialisation when Raising the Section 107A Exemption Read More »

ANI vs OpenAI: India’s Copyright Act is outdated. Can it Deal with New Legal Conundrums?

Last month, a group of digital news publishers in India sought to join a case filed by news agency ANI in the Delhi High Court accusing the US firm OpenAI of misusing material to which they own the copyright. However, in India, OpenAI faces a major hurdle. India’s Copyright Act of 1957 and related jurisprudence favours the rights of authors and creators and was not designed to deal with the challenges posed by this emerging technology. Further, tortious claims of

ANI vs OpenAI: India’s Copyright Act is outdated. Can it Deal with New Legal Conundrums? Read More »

Image with SpicyIP logo and the words "Weekly Review"

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 3 – February 9)

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the Lodha trademark dispute, the scrapping of the UGC-Care list, and the escalation of the Nayanthara-Dhanush copyright battle. This and a lot more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Highlights of the Week Of house marks and family disputes: Taking a look at the Lodha v. Lodha TM battle  Following

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 3 – February 9) Read More »

Logos of the Lodha and HoABL

Of house marks and family disputes: Taking a look at the Lodha v. Lodha TM battle 

Macrotech Developers (formerly known as ‘Lodha Developers’) filed a trademark infringement suit against the ‘House of Abhinandan Lodha’ (HoABL). Macrotech, in the suit, has sought an injunction against HoABL from using the TM ‘Lodha’ to prevent confusion among consumers. Further, Macrotech has sought Rs. 5000 cr. in damages. Abhishek Lodha (CEO, Macrotech Developers), in this interview, has said that the suit is to ensure that the consumers are not confused that any other developer using the Lodha name is associated with Macrotech or

Of house marks and family disputes: Taking a look at the Lodha v. Lodha TM battle  Read More »

Whose Copyright Stands Tall? Looking at Saregama India v Vels Film International

Explaining the recent Delhi High Court order in Saregama v. Vels on copyright ownership over the song En Iniya Pon Nilave, Tanishka Goswami writes on the implication of the decision on the composers. Tanishka is an advocate at the High Court of MP. She graduated from National Law University, Delhi in 2023 & enjoys reading and writing on copyright laws. Her previous posts can be found here. Whose Copyright Stands Tall? Looking at Saregama India v Vels Film International By Tanishka

Whose Copyright Stands Tall? Looking at Saregama India v Vels Film International Read More »

CGPDTM to Fund Law Students Participating in any International IP Moot Court Competitions: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal

In a major, and very interesting development for law students, the Commerce and Industry Minister Mr. Piyush Goyal announced that the CGPDTM will sponsor Indian law students selected for any IP moot court competition “anywhere in the world”. This announcement was made yesterday in the inaugural ceremony of Vidhi Pragati: National IP Moot Court Competition, 2025, organized by DPIIT in collaboration with CIIPC and IPR Chair, NLU Delhi (see video here). The move enabling law students to participate in moot

CGPDTM to Fund Law Students Participating in any International IP Moot Court Competitions: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal Read More »

Reform, Don’t Reject: Here’s Why the UGC-CARE List Should Not Be Scrapped

The past weeks saw several unconfirmed reports (see, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, among others) about the dissolution of the University Grants Commission’s (UGC) much-avowed Consortium for Academics and Research Ethics (CARE) List, attributed to internal sources within the UGC and the Ministry of Education. As observed in an earlier report, the latest draft of the UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment & Promotion of Teachers and Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards

Reform, Don’t Reject: Here’s Why the UGC-CARE List Should Not Be Scrapped Read More »

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecourieronline.co.uk%2Freview-prima-facie-national-theatre-live%2F&psig=AOvVaw0GhUg3XlHYd2bUE7ekS1SM&ust=1738923306680000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBQQjRxqFwoTCKio6KTorosDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAS

The New Patent Playbook in Action: A Look at Rules 25(1) and 55(3) of the Patent (Amendment) Rules 2024 for Pre-Grant Oppositions

Recently, an interesting order was issued in Patent Application No. 202417006578 (pdf), by Vikas Verma, Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs, Patent Office (Chennai), in the context of a pre-grant opposition (PGO) against an application by Pharmazz Inc. What makes this decision particularly noteworthy is that it may be the first instance (at least as per the guess in a LinkedIn post by LCGN LLP here) where a new rule for PGO has been applied. Specifically, it concerns the requirement

The New Patent Playbook in Action: A Look at Rules 25(1) and 55(3) of the Patent (Amendment) Rules 2024 for Pre-Grant Oppositions Read More »

Kollywood’s Copyright Battle Escalates, But What is the Urgency?

The Nayanthara Dhanush copyright battle is escalating. Arguments are scheduled for the 26th and it is bound to be an interesting showdown. There have been two important developments after the parties filed their respective pleadings before the Madras High Court on the issue of copyright infringement involving the alleged unauthorized use of behind-the-scenes clips. First, the Madras High Court clarified that it has the necessary jurisdiction and that pre-suit mediation was not required in this case (see pdf). In this,

Kollywood’s Copyright Battle Escalates, But What is the Urgency? Read More »

Scroll to Top