The special issue also boasts an introduction from leading scholars, BS Chimni and David Trubek. And has been edited by another academic stalwart, Prof YS Lee.
Special Issue (2010): New Voices from Emerging Powers – Brazil and India
Introduction
By: Bhupinder Chimni and David Trubek
Linking Promises to Policies: Law and Development in an Unequal Brazil
By: Diogo R. Coutinho
The Persistence of Formalism: Towards a Situated Critique beyond the Classic Separation of Powers
By: Jose R. Rodriguez
Development Bank, Law and Innovation Financing in a New Brazilian Economy
By: Mario Schapiro
John Rawls’ Justice as Fairness and the WTO: A Critical Analysis on the Initial Position of the Multilateral Agricultural Negotiation
By: Rafael Rosa Cedro and Bruno Furtado Vieira
Turning Trips on Its Head: An “IP Cross Retaliation” Model for Developing Countries
By: Shamnad Basheer
Exceptions and Limitations in Indian Copyright Law for Education: An Assessment By: Lawrence Liang
The Indian Competition Act: A Historical and Developmental Perspective
By: Shiju Varghese Mazhuvanchery
Product Patents and Access to Medicines in India: A Critical Review of the Implementation of TRIPS Patent Regime
By: Gopakumar K. M.
Transit and Trade Barriers in South Asia: Multilateral Obligations and Development Perspective
By: Prabir De
Stock Market and Shareholder Protection: Are They Important for Economic Growth?
By: Francis Xavier Rathinam and A. V. Raja

hi shamnad,
just read in today’s newspaper (toi) about the joint action taken by india n brazil regarding the drug seizures (border/customs/transit) issue against the eu/netherland at wto. a move that shud ve been made earlier.
-aditya kant
You’re absolutely right Aditya. This is a good move and will put some pressure on teh EU. However, as I’ve indicated earlier, I’m not so certain about the prospects of winning, given that we have taken on the EU directly (as opposed to individual member countries that did the actual seizures). My bet is that this would be settled soon and we will not end up with a panel decision.
honestly, i ve not yet examined the issue from that angle. tho i remember your earlier post (about an year ago, i guess) in favour of taking on with the individual countries first. logically, your proposition appears to be a better route.
-aditya kant