Plant Variety Protection

Govt. Appoints Nuziveedu Chairperson to PVPFR Authority


Prabhakar Rao

Prabhakar Rao

The ET recently reported that the Ministry of Agriculture has appointed Prabhakar Rao, Chairman of Nuziveedu Seeds to the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (“Authority”), a statutory body that is created under Section 3 of the Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001 (PVPFRA). As per this provision, the Authority is to consist of 15 members plus a chairperson, all of whom are appointed by the Central Government. This provision also requires the Central Government to appoint one representative from the seed industry to the Authority. According to the same ET report, Prabhakar Rao is replacing Usha Zehr of Mahyco on the Authority. Mahyco is in a joint venture with Monsanto and as readers may be aware Nuziveedu is currently involved in a massive IP litigation with Monsanto – we’ve written about it over here and here.

Apart from the industry representative, the remaining members on the Authority are mostly ex-officio positions – bureaucrats from various ministries and departments. This model of administration is not entirely unknown in Indian law. The Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Insecticide Act, 1968 both have similar models wherein technical boards with an advisory or policy making function are staffed with representatives from across the government and nominated representatives from industry and academia. As per this legislation, the job of actually administering the legislation is left to administrative officers who exercise quasi-judicial roles. Similarly, the PVPFRA splits functions between the Authority and the Registrar-General/Registrars although the distinction isn’t quite that clear.

Although it is only the Registrars who can examine new PVP applications, adjudicate oppositions and issue registration certificates, it is the Authority which appoints the Registrars under Section 12 of the PVPFRA. In other words, the legislative design of this law allows for the industry to have a say in the appointment of Registrars who will then examine and register PVP applications and conduct oppositions. Incidentally, Nuziveedu is one of the largest filers of PVP applications for new plant varieties. Obviously there are going to be concerns regarding ‘conflict of interest’ with the appointment of Rao. This is not to say that there was no conflict of interest with the presence of Zehr on the Authority.

Apart from the appointment of Registrar/s, the Authority also has a policy role. It is required under the law to set the criteria of distinctiveness, uniformity and stability for registration of extant varieties, the standards for evaluating seeds under tests required under the law etc.

In addition, the Authority also plays an adjudicatory role while discharging some of the other functions under the PVPFRA. The first adjudicatory role is under Section 26, when the Authority deals with “benefit-sharing” claims. As explained in an earlier post, Section 26 is one of the pivots of Nuziveedu’s IP strategy in its battle with Monsanto. The second adjudicatory role is with regard to compulsory licences when certain seeds are not meeting the reasonable requirements of the public. The Authority and not the Registrars are responsible for determining compulsory licensing requests.

Of course, you could argue that there are 14 other members on the Authority but the fact of the matter is that these are technical issues and industry representatives like Rao will have the upper hand in any decision making because they are the ones who understand the technicalities the best. Section 4 of the same law which lays down the rule for conducting the authority’s proceedings requires all proceedings to be conducted through a vote of all members of the Authority. As per the same provisions, members who may have a conflict of interest are required under the law to declare their conflict and not attend the meeting. It is therefore necessary that going ahead, the Authority conducts its proceedings with the utmost transparency and exclude the industry representatives in all meetings wherein they may have a conflict of interest.

Tags:
Prashant Reddy

Prashant Reddy

T. Prashant Reddy graduated from the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, with a B.A.LLB (Hons.) degree in 2008. He later graduated with a LLM degree (Law, Science & Technology) from the Stanford Law School in 2013. Prashant has worked with law firms in Delhi and in academia in India and Singapore. He is also co-author of the book Create, Copy, Disrupt: India's Intellectual Property Dilemmas (OUP).

4 comments.

  1. AvatarAnyonymous

    I think that manner of selection process for appointment of non-official member(s) was never a transparent process. It was/is always a surprise to others. Further, the time of three years for non-official(s) appointment as prescribed is more, as it provides more time lobbying opportunity.
    I am little doubtful that how a person being an largest applicant for PVP and involved in litigations related to PVP will be able to attend any of the Authority’s meeting, if section (5) is followed correctly. It state that “Every member who is in any way, whether directly, indirectly or personally, concerned or interested in a matter to be decided at the meeting shall disclose the nature of his concern or interest and after such disclosure, the member, concerned or interested, shall not attend that meeting” I think managing the conflict of interest would be big challenge.

    Reply
  2. AvatarBhaskar

    kudos to the achievement of a techno business person. In the earlier period of earlier Chairmen of P.P.V.F.R.I. has proved its worth . the present chairman is another is also hoped that he will excel in his term. Any way vigilant print and electronic media will make the P.P.V.F.R.I to ensure the Access and Benefit Sharing (A.B.S.) for Mega bio diverse country like ours.

    Reply
  3. AvatarIP Prodessional

    I believe that heading is not read properly. Heading is to state that Govt haa appointed Nuziveedu’s chairman to PPVFR Authoriry as non-official person. He is appointed for three year term. It is to share clearly that he is not appointed as Chairperson to Authority, which is official post.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.