IPAB’s Power of Review
This is a slightly dated order of the IPAB (August 2009), where it was held that IPAB does not have the power of substantive review of its decisions. The order was delivered in an appeal involving Nestle, the appeal arising out of the rejection under Section 15 of Nestle’s application for a patent. The hearing on the appeal was adjourned twice at the request of the authorized counsel for the appellant; a third date was also sought and granted to […]
IPAB’s Power of Review Read More »