Author name: Lokesh Vyas

Lokesh is a PhD candidate at Sciences Po, Paris, where he examines the “genealogy of international copyright discourse (1850s–2000)” under the guidance of Professors Séverine Dusollier and Alain Pottage. He graduated from the Institute of Law, Nirma University, and later pursued an LL.M. at American University Washington College of Law as an Arcadia Fellow and Arodhum Scholar. He was previously a visiting scholar at the University of Cambridge. Lokesh is interested in questions of knowledge governance, which he enjoys exploring through historical and philosophical inquiry. He also takes a certain, steady satisfaction in essay competitions—having been fortunate to fare fairly well—securing, for instance, the first Shamnad Basheer Essay Competition in 2020 and the ATRIP Annual Essay Competition in 2024. He can be contacted at lokesh.vyas[at]sciencespo[dot]fr.

The Screenwriters Rights Association of India (SRAI) is registered, but what is a Script: A Dramatic or a Literary work?

/ By / Others

“Overlap”—such an interesting word, isn’t it? It’s everywhere. Our ideas overlap, our works overlap, our words overlap, and even our feelings and emotions. And yes, so do our laws and their intricate concepts. But why am I talking about overlaps? While reading the news about the Screenwriters Rights Association of India (SRAI) officially registering as a Copyright Society (Reg. No. CS/06/2024), the word clung to my mind. Especially when a close friend (who prefers to remain anonymous) pointed out the […]

The Screenwriters Rights Association of India (SRAI) is registered, but what is a Script: A Dramatic or a Literary work? Read More »

SpicyIP Tidbit: Reasons be Recorded While Granting Ex-parte Injunctions, held the Delhi High Court

/ By / Others

Recently, Praharsh shared an interesting order, Kailash Kumar Jain v. Kundan Electro, with me concerning ex-parte proceedings—where the Delhi High Court called out non-recording of reasons by the trial court for granting ex-parte injunctions, setting the suit afresh. While there have been past instances where courts have criticized the unreasoned granting of interim ex-parte injunctions (see, e.g., here), the present case places special emphasis on this issue. Examining the current law and cases on ex-parte injunctions, the case raises the

SpicyIP Tidbit: Reasons be Recorded While Granting Ex-parte Injunctions, held the Delhi High Court Read More »

SpicyIP Tidbit: DPIIT Hits Pause on Public Notice concerning Music Playing at Weddings Amid Novex Case Appeal

/ By / Others

Namaskar. Remember the Goan circular concerning section 52(1)(za) of the Copyright Act, 1957, saying no permission is required to perform music at religious ceremonies, including weddings and its connected social events, which was later revoked? And many other stories of the provision we’ve commented on in the past? Well, we now have a “new” twist in this story …  The news is that DPIIT has issued a new notification that puts the previous 24th July 2023 Public Notice on hold

SpicyIP Tidbit: DPIIT Hits Pause on Public Notice concerning Music Playing at Weddings Amid Novex Case Appeal Read More »

Don’t Offend My Oats: Generic Disparagement, Market Leadership, and Marico Limited vs. Alpino Health Foods

/ By / Others

Trademark law has an interesting concept—generic disparagement that goes a bit further than general disparagement. In this post, I discuss one such case from the Delhi High Court: Marico Limited vs. Alpino Health Foods Pvt Ltd, where the plaintiff (“Marico”) seemed to take the whole “disparagement” thing a bit too personally (or perhaps, generally). Facts: The story has it that Marico has been in the oats business since 2010 and sells it under the name “Saffola Oats,” but it has

Don’t Offend My Oats: Generic Disparagement, Market Leadership, and Marico Limited vs. Alpino Health Foods Read More »

Whither Indian IP Academics’ Engagement with the Judiciary?: Some Thoughts for Discussion – Part II

/ By / Others

In Part I, we looked at the legal mechanism around IP professors’ engagement with the judiciary. This post furthers the discussion by broaching a few questions/ideas for engagement. Two Hypotheses and Many Questions  I get two points or hypotheses from the Part-I discussion: the Indian legal system doesn’t see, or at least doesn’t leave much space for (IP) law professors as influential drivers of socio-legal change, unlike advocates, leaving little room for them to make substantial contributions outside the classroom.

Whither Indian IP Academics’ Engagement with the Judiciary?: Some Thoughts for Discussion – Part II Read More »

Whither Indian IP Academics’ Engagement with the Judiciary?: Some Thoughts for Discussion – Part I

/ By / Others

Recently, Praharsh revived a discussion about the not-very-active state of IP academic interventions in India while sharing the news of the appointment of Prof. Arul Scaria by the Delhi High Court as an “expert” in a copyright case. Prashant raised similar questions a few years ago when Prof. Basheer was appointed, as an “academic intervenor” in the Novartis case. Swaraj, during our conversations about Indian IP thinking and IP academia, has also made similar points several times as to —why

Whither Indian IP Academics’ Engagement with the Judiciary?: Some Thoughts for Discussion – Part I Read More »

Journey Through “Mays” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) 

/ By / Others

As I conclude my summer vacation at home, it’s the perfect moment to bring the series I started over a year ago to its conclusion … Welcome to the climactic finale of our “Sifting Through SpicyIP Pages” series! Yes, it’s the 12th and final post, culminating this year-long time-travel-ish journey. I began the series with a sense of Sankofa—aiming to fetch what was left behind (if any) and see how we can take things forward. We aimed to explore SpicyIP’s

Journey Through “Mays” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)  Read More »

Notes from the Doctoral Diary: 42nd ATRIP Congress in Rome (30th June – 3rd July 2024)

/ By / Others

Salaam … Recently, I met Prashant Reddy who shared his experience of the 2018 WIPO-WTO colloquium for Teachers of IP from Developing Countries and Countries in Transition. While I was planning to save my experience in writing, meeting Prashant motivated me to share my experience of the 42nd ATRIP Congress with all our readers. My hope is twofold: Firstly, to encourage scholars, particularly from the Global South, to participate in next year’s Congress and leave their mark. This is a

Notes from the Doctoral Diary: 42nd ATRIP Congress in Rome (30th June – 3rd July 2024) Read More »

Journey Through “Aprils” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

/ By / Others

As I said in the “Marchs” post, here’s the April sift and 11th post of our Sifting through SpicyIP pages series. Previously, we have journeyed through the SpicyIP’s pages from June to March, which you can take a quick glance through this SpicyIP Flashbacks. Let’s get into what Aprils offered on SpicyIP: Juggling around Jurisdiction issues: “Where do I file my case?” is a fundamental question in legal disputes, as jurisdiction determines the proper court for initiating a case. Traveling

Journey Through “Aprils” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) Read More »

Journey Through “Marchs” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

/ By / Others

Namaskar … I am back with the “Sifting Through SpicyIP Pages” series! Apologies for the long delay; life got busier for some undesirable reasons. But things have finally gotten better, and this blogger is back. Mind you, I haven’t returned with just one post. Nope! I did two rounds this time – March and April to compensate for the wait. This is the “Marchs” Sift; the “Aprils” edition is here.  As we dive into the 10th post of this series

Journey Through “Marchs” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) Read More »

Scroll to Top