Feedback on draft guidelines for Computer Related Inventions
Image from here The IPO recently received feedback on its draft guidelines for Computer Related Inventions (here). Madhulika blogged about these guidelines (here). Feedback revolve mainly around the following issues: • Most of the comments view the guideline’s interpretation of S. 3(k) as unduly ‘restrictive’, especially with regard to the meaning of ‘computer programs per se’. Comments also highlight the lack of examples of computer programs that are patentable and point to the fact that that the guideline only give […]
Feedback on draft guidelines for Computer Related Inventions Read More »