SpicyIP Events: Pharma IPR India 2012, Mumbai, 31 Jan – 2 Feb 2012

/ By / Uncategorized

As some of you get into holiday mood, the folks at Pharma IPR India 2012 send us a gentle reminder of their event scheduled for 31 Jan-2 Feb 2012, which we posted on here earlier. It is an event for managing IPR and driving global market entry strategy by analysing latest reforms, patentability and techno-legal intricacies in the pharma and biopharma industry. Holiday Offer – 10% discount on the current discounted rates for all new bookings – valid only till […]

SpicyIP Events: Pharma IPR India 2012, Mumbai, 31 Jan – 2 Feb 2012 Read More »

Multiplexes to Show Anti-Piracy Clips. Oops! They’re Doing It Again.

/ By / Copyright

In a landmark move set to highlight India’s strong anti-piracy stance, the Ministry for Information & Broadcasting has issued directions to all multiplex owners that an anti-piracy clip is to be shown to audiences each time before the movie is shown.  Involvement of FICCI  The move came from a request made by FICCI after extensive discussions were held in a conference organized by it in Mumbai on 17th October and the issue was raised by Yash Raj Chopra. FICCI will

Multiplexes to Show Anti-Piracy Clips. Oops! They’re Doing It Again. Read More »

The selection process for appointment of Technical Member (Patents), IPAB

/ By / Uncategorized

The DIPP recently replied to my RTI application asking for information pertaining to the appointment of Mr. D.P.S. Parmar as the Technical Member (Patents) IPAB. The Technical Member is supposed to sit along with a Judicial Member to adjudicate patent revocations and also appeals against the Controller. The previous person to hold this post was Mr. Chandrashekaran, who was earlier the Controller General of Patents.  We can now confirm the following 8 persons applied for the post: (i) Mr. D.P.S.

The selection process for appointment of Technical Member (Patents), IPAB Read More »

Are missing files a problem at the Indian Patent Office?

/ By / Uncategorized

While it is now established beyond doubt that missing files are a massive problem at the Trade Marks Registry, I would like to know from patent lawyers whether they are facing a similar problem at the patents office. So far I know of only one case which ended up in court over a missing pre-grant opposition file. That case had been filed by Polymedicure Ltd. and did not involve its own files but instead the files of a patent which

Are missing files a problem at the Indian Patent Office? Read More »

Guest Post: A TM Lawyer expresses his ‘kolaveri’ against the Trademark Office

/ By / Trademark

I’m sure that by now most of our readers have heard of the absurd yet super-popular ‘kolaveri’ song which went viral across the country in a matter of a few weeks. The operational word ‘kolaveri’, a Tamil word, is supposed to mean ‘murderous rage’. For the last few weeks we’ve been receiving some ‘kolaveri’ from practitioners upset, in particular, with my style of writing. It is therefore a pleasure to receive the following piece from a practitioner, expressing his ‘kolaveri’

Guest Post: A TM Lawyer expresses his ‘kolaveri’ against the Trademark Office Read More »

Delhi HC winks at the IPR (Import) Rules, 2007 in the L.G. Electronics case

/ By / Uncategorized

Mathews last week had carried this post, summarizing an ex-parte order by Justice Manmohan Singh in the case of L.G. Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. BharatBhogilal Patel & Othrs. Image from here. In this post I would like to critically analyse the order and its implications for future cases. Before proceeding any further, I would like to briefly point our readers to the Ramkumar case, where Customs Authorities had seized consignments of imported mobile phones which were allegedly infringing Ramkumar’s patents.

Delhi HC winks at the IPR (Import) Rules, 2007 in the L.G. Electronics case Read More »

Missed deadlines, docketing errors and unintentional vs. unavoidable errors

/ By / Patent

The Delhi patent office recently issued two well reasoned decisions relating to PCT applications that were filed after the 31 month deadlines.  Both decisions were issued by Dr. K.S. Kardam and in both decisions, the Controller held that because the applicant had missed the deadlines, did not provide sufficient cause for extension of time, information of the applications had become part of the public domain; and both applications were therefore, deemed to be withdrawn.  Interestingly, both cases were handled by

Missed deadlines, docketing errors and unintentional vs. unavoidable errors Read More »

Microsoft Continues its IP Enforcement Drive, Wins Damages

/ By / Uncategorized

We have yet another case of Microsoft seeking and receiving punitive damages for pirated software being used by a small hardware manufacturer in the course of sale of its products. The decision can be viewed here.  The Present Case   In this case, Microsoft alleged that the defendants, a business entity engaged in marketing and selling computer hardware, including assembled desktops and other peripherals. It appears that the vendors were in the habit of pre-installing unauthorised and unlicensed copies of

Microsoft Continues its IP Enforcement Drive, Wins Damages Read More »

Debating the legality and the efficacy of the CSIR-Patent Office agreement to out-source prior art searches

/ By / Uncategorized

Earlier this year, the Patent Office entered into an outsourcing agreement with the Council for Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) wherein a specialized division of the latter would conduct prior art searches for pending patent applications and prepare search reports which would be used by patent office examiners to decide the patentability of an invention. The ostensible reason behind this move was to help clear the massive backlog of patent applications at the patent office. This story was initially reported

Debating the legality and the efficacy of the CSIR-Patent Office agreement to out-source prior art searches Read More »

SpicyIP Announcements: National Seminar on Critical Issues in International Commercial Arbitration 2012

/ By / Event

SpicyIP is pleased to announce that the National Law Institute University, Bhopal, in association with the University Grants Commission is organising a seminar titled “National Seminar on Critical Issues in International Commercial Arbitration 2012” on 3rd and 4th March, 2012. In their endeavor to encourage scholarship in the area of Corporate Law among law students, CBCL is specifically looking forward to receiving scholarly articles on the subject of Critical Issues in International Commercial Arbitration authored by students, faculties and academicians

SpicyIP Announcements: National Seminar on Critical Issues in International Commercial Arbitration 2012 Read More »

Scroll to Top