All these days I was under impression that computer programmes a.k.a softwares were not patentable under s.3(k) of the Patents Act notwithstanding the presence of a teeny-weenie “per se”. May be the patent office is in an “innovative” mood for according to the Business Line, one Mr.Ken Georgie Mathew had applied 18 months ago for a data verification tool called the “Authentic Track Record” (ATR) and so far he has not received any objections. Is it because the Patent Office is still mulling over patentability? Or is it because the examination is yet to begin? I am not sure which is better for Mr.Mathew. Readers may recall that Mr.Basheer had in an earlier post discussed the issue of patentability of softwares in
Hey, I think the software not being granted a patent is the Indian position. However, if you read a previous post by Prashant you will see the recent judgment of the UK COurts which have overturned the Aerotel/Macrossan case.