Author name: SpicyIP

Spicy IP Weekly Review (April 2- April 8)

/ By / Copyright, Geographical Indication, Others, Patent, Trademark

[This weekly review has been co-authored with SpicyIP intern Rohan Srivastava. Rohan is a second-year student pursuing B.A. LL.B (Hons.) from National Law School of India University, Bengaluru.] Here are the quick summaries of the 5 posts, 8  case summaries, and other IP developments that took place last week. Important IP cases that we’re missing out on? Especially from different High Courts?  Please let us know so we can include them! Highlights of the Week Madras High Court Notifies Intellectual […]

Spicy IP Weekly Review (April 2- April 8) Read More »

Oreo v Fab!o: A Ballad of Colours and Syllables [PART II]

/ By / Trademark

[This two-part post has been co-authored by Kartik Sharma and Aditya Singh, analysing the Delhi High Court decision in Intercontinental Great Brands v. Parle Product Pvt. Ltd. In Part I, the authors analyzed the court’s consideration of intention in its assessment of passing off and trademark infringement. In Part II of the post, they assess the court’s finding on phonetic similarity between Fabio and Oreo and on the trade dress of the competing goods. Kartik and Aditya are 2nd-year students at NLSIU,

Oreo v Fab!o: A Ballad of Colours and Syllables [PART II] Read More »

Oreo v Fab!o: A Ballad of Colours and Syllables [PART I]

/ By / Trademark

[This two-part post has been co-authored by Kartik Sharma and Aditya Singh, analysing the Delhi High Court decision in Intercontinental Great Brands v. Parle Product Pvt. Ltd. In Part I of the post, the authors have analyzed the court’s consideration of intention in its assessment of passing off and trademark infringement. Kartik and Aditya are 2nd-year students at NLSIU, Bengaluru, and had earlier written for us here, here and here.] The world of sweet cookies saw a rather bitter dispute unfolding in the Delhi

Oreo v Fab!o: A Ballad of Colours and Syllables [PART I] Read More »

Examining Deeming Abandonment in the Trade Marks Act – A Call for Revaluation?

/ By / Trademark

[This post has been authored by Ritwik Sharma. Ritwik is a final year student of law at the Institute of Law, Nirma University.] In what can be considered déjà vu, the Trade Marks Registry has once again released notifications to carry out mass abandonments. As per this post, nearly 98,000 trademark applications and 82,000 opposed trademark applications are now vulnerable to abandonment due to the non-filing of the reply to examination reports and counterstatements respectively within the prescribed time-period specified

Examining Deeming Abandonment in the Trade Marks Act – A Call for Revaluation? Read More »

Call for Papers: NLU Jodhpur’s Journal of Intellectual Property Studies Vol. VII, Issue II [Submit by May 28]

/ By / Opportunities, Publication

We’re pleased to announce that NLU Jodhpur’s Journal of Intellectual Property Studies (JIPS) is inviting original, unpublished manuscripts for publication for its upcoming issue (Volume VII, Issue II). The last date for submissions is May 28, 2023. For further details, please read the journal’s call for papers below: Call for Papers: NLU Jodhpur’s Journal of Intellectual Property Studies [Vol. VII, Issue II] About the organization/institution National Law University-Jodhpur (NLU Jodhpur) is one of India’s leading Law Schools situated in the vibrant

Call for Papers: NLU Jodhpur’s Journal of Intellectual Property Studies Vol. VII, Issue II [Submit by May 28] Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 27-April 1)

/ By / Copyright, Geographical Indication, Innovation, Others, Patent, Trademark

[This weekly review is co-authored with SpicyIP intern Anjali Baskar. Anjali is a fourth-year student pursuing B.B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) from School of Law, Christ University, Bengaluru. She is keenly interested in exploring various fields in law, especially IP, Media & Entertainment.] Here are the quick summaries of the whopping 6 posts, 8  case summaries and other IP developments that took place last week. Important IP cases that we’re missing out on? Especially from other High Courts?  Please let us know

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 27-April 1) Read More »

Announcing the SpicyIP Doctoral Fellowship!

/ By / Opportunities

We are very excited to announce SpicyIP’s new Doctoral Fellowship! The SpicyIP Doctoral Fellowship has been devised keeping in mind our commitment to foster transparency and accountability within the Indian IP regime. It will be awarded to select doctoral scholars in universities based in India who are pursuing their PhD in the broad area of intellectual property rights and/or innovation policy, and with a focus on public interest, transparency and accountability, or socially beneficial legal and policy levers. In addition

Announcing the SpicyIP Doctoral Fellowship! Read More »

Skechers Inc. USA Vs. Pure Play Sports – Part II : Imposition Of Actual Legal Costs – No More A Far-Fetched Aspiration In Today’s Legal Environment

/ By / Others

[This guest post has been authored by Dr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Urvashi Misra, Aman Chaudhary. The authors Dr. Abhimanyu Chopra (Partner), Urvashi Misra (Senior Associate) and Aman Chaudhary (Associate) are with AZB & Partners and represented the Plaintiffs i.e. Skechers USA Inc. and its affiliate entities in the case. Views expressed here are those of the authors.] In 2018, we discussed the “Implications of Actual Costs and Taxation of Costs – A Notable And Welcome Change In the IP Regime” in

Skechers Inc. USA Vs. Pure Play Sports – Part II : Imposition Of Actual Legal Costs – No More A Far-Fetched Aspiration In Today’s Legal Environment Read More »

Trademark Disparagement, Free Speech and Bullying: The Case of Dabur v. Dhruv Rathee

/ By / Trademark

[This post is authored by SpicyIP intern Srujan Sangai. Srujan is a second-year BA LLB student at the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. He is interested in intellectual property law and technology law.] Dhruv Rathee, a popular Youtuber found himself in a court battle against Dabur India (Dabur India Limited v. Dhruv Rathee) for criticizing its “Real” packaged fruit juice in his (now removed) video ‘Is Fruit Juice Healthy? | The Harsh Truth’. Dabur, who is no stranger to product

Trademark Disparagement, Free Speech and Bullying: The Case of Dabur v. Dhruv Rathee Read More »

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 20-March 25)

/ By / Copyright, Design, Others, Patent, Trademark

[This weekly review is co-authored with SpicyIP intern Niranjana Biju. Niranjana is a second-year student pursuing B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) from NUALS, Kochi. She is keenly interested in exploring various fields in law, especially IP, TMT and dispute resolution.] Here are the quick summaries of the 3 posts, 7 case summaries and other IP developments that took place last week. Important IP cases that we’re missing out on? Especially from other High Courts?  Please let us know so we can include

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 20-March 25) Read More »

Scroll to Top