Stalemate over WIPO Treaty on Copyright Exceptions for Persons with Print Disabilities

/ By / Others

In what comes as a major setback to India, home to nearly 50% of the world’s blind population, the 24th Session of the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) concluded on July 25, 2012 in Geneva without making any significant progress on WIPO’s maiden treaty recognizing the rights of the disabled. The proposed treaty seeks to impose an obligation on member nations to create exceptions and limitations in their domestic copyright regime to enable conversion of books […]

Stalemate over WIPO Treaty on Copyright Exceptions for Persons with Print Disabilities Read More »

Breaking News: Natco Admits to Bad Faith and BMS attempts Patent Linkage!

/ By / Drug Regulation

In a startling revelation, Natco admitted (albeit indirectly) that it had lied in its response to BMS’s quia timet law suit, wherein BMS approached the Delhi High Court in 2009, apprehending imminent infringement of its patent covering Dasatinib, an anti cancer drug.  In an earlier post, I noted that Natco may have committed a fatal legal blunder by stating on oath before the Delhi High court that: “It is denied that the Defendants intend to launch a generic version of

Breaking News: Natco Admits to Bad Faith and BMS attempts Patent Linkage! Read More »

Patent "Perception": A Contemptuous Natco?

/ By / Drug Regulation

For the longest time, Cipla ranked as our leading poster child for the debate on patents and access to affordable medicines. It took on the multinational drug majors at the drop of a hat and was credited with slashing prices of HIV medications to a small fraction of their prevalent rates. Yusuf Hamied, Cipla’s maverick leader, tellingly notes in a recent interview that:  “We had taken the lead to provide affordable medicine for AIDS and I think the time has

Patent "Perception": A Contemptuous Natco? Read More »

Of Compulsory Licences, a Few Good Men and Patent "Teachings"

/ By / Uncategorized

Some months ago, the Indian Patent Office handed down what must rate as one of the most significant IP decisions of this decade (and perhaps the last several as well).  A decision that elicited as many supporters, as it did critics. Reputed economics professor, Arvind Panagariya went so far as to state: “It is said that only God and a few good men and women run India. One such man is P H Kurien. For readers unfamiliar with his name,

Of Compulsory Licences, a Few Good Men and Patent "Teachings" Read More »

Spicy IP Tidbit: Patent Office publishes List of Applications deemed as Traditional Knowledge

/ By / Patent

The regular readers of Spicy IP would no doubt be aware of the controversies surrounding the so-called “confidential” status accorded to Traditional Knowledge and relating information (for previous posts, see here). There have also been instances where RTIs have been filed with CSIR in order to obtain information about the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library project (TKDL) (see here and here). However, there is some welcome news for those, who share our penchant for transparency to the greatest extent possible in every

Spicy IP Tidbit: Patent Office publishes List of Applications deemed as Traditional Knowledge Read More »

Internet Association Lobby formed

/ By / Privacy

In what is bound to change the terms of negotiations of internet related legislation, 4 of the largest internet companies have come together with other undisclosed companies to form the Internet Association Lobby. The four are Google, Facebook, Amazon and Ebay, led by former (US) Congressional staffer Michael Beckerman. While the coming together of these 4 super-heavyweights is potentially scenery changing, the only common ground that I can see is net-neutrality and of course the stronger possibility for tax-breaks now. Net-neutrality, essentially

Internet Association Lobby formed Read More »

New Leadership at SpicyIP

/ By / Uncategorized

In an earlier post, I expressed my desire to step down from the leadership of SpicyIP. This decision (over which I procrastinated for several months) stemmed from a variety of reasons, the most significant of which was  my extensive involvement with a whole host of projects around legal education (most pertinently, an access to education project for underprivileged students, titled IDIA).  I therefore thought it better to hand over leadership to someone with more bandwidth to handle the onerous task

New Leadership at SpicyIP Read More »

Madras Bar Association fights to save independence of key tribunals from the ‘babus’ of the Central Govt.

/ By / Uncategorized

Image from here The ToI and the legal news website Law et. al. have both reported on a public interest litigation filed by the Madras Bar Association before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality and administration of several tribunals. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Union of India on the petition. Given the scope of the relief prayed for in the petition, the case has the potential to both streamline and revolutionize the increasingly powerful and unwieldy tribunal system

Madras Bar Association fights to save independence of key tribunals from the ‘babus’ of the Central Govt. Read More »

APEDA discloses legal expenses on ‘Basmati’ – Rs. 7,62,00,000 and counting;

/ By / Uncategorized

Finally, after much coaxing and at least one appeal, the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) has disclosed its legal expenses on protecting and registering the phrase ‘Basmati’ as a ‘trademark’ and as a ‘geographical indication’. The response can be viewed over here.  As per APEDA’s reply, “An amount of Rs. 7.62 crores (Rs. 7,62,00,000) has been paid to M/s K&S Partners as aggregate professional fee from 1995-96 to 2011-12 (upto 31.3.2012) towards protection of intellectual property

APEDA discloses legal expenses on ‘Basmati’ – Rs. 7,62,00,000 and counting; Read More »

20th Century Fox Film Corporation v. Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Ors.

/ By / Copyright

This recently decided case involves a TV show, Time Bomb, produced by Zee Telefilms in 2005. The Plaintiffs alleged that this was a copy of their acclaimed show 24. The case was filed in 2005 and seems slightly dated since none of these shows are on air anymore. It is also quite puzzling to see the court deciding  on whether an interim injunction should be granted nearly 7 years after the suit was first filed in 2005. In this suit the

20th Century Fox Film Corporation v. Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Ors. Read More »

Scroll to Top