Author name: SpicyIP

SpicyIP Fellowship 2019-20: FUCT the USPTO? – Revisiting the Free Speech, Morality and Trademark Law Debate

We’re pleased to bring to you a guest post by our fellowship applicant, Akanshha Agrawal. Akanshha is a 3rd year student at National Law University, Delhi. This is her first submission for the Fellowship. In  this post, Akanshha discusses the recent US Supreme Court judgment in Iancu v. Brunetti, which held the Lanham Act’s ‘immoral or scandalous’ bar on the registration of trademarks to be unconstitutional.   FUCT the USPTO? – Revisiting Free Speech Under Trademark Law Akanshha Agrawal In […]

SpicyIP Fellowship 2019-20: FUCT the USPTO? – Revisiting the Free Speech, Morality and Trademark Law Debate Read More »

Banglar Rasogolla v. Odisha Rasagola: Deciphering the Real Win

We’re pleased to bring to you an interesting guest post by Jupi Gogoi on the ongoing dispute between West Bengal and Orissa over the GI tag for rasgulla, which we’ve covered on the blog earlier here, here and here. Jupi is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. She was formerly associated with the Indian Law Institute, Delhi. Jupi has guest blogged for us in the past as well (see here).     Banglar Rasogolla v.

Banglar Rasogolla v. Odisha Rasagola: Deciphering the Real Win Read More »

Tips Industries v. Wynk Music: A Case of Statutory Mis-Interpretation?

We’re pleased to bring to you a guest post by Karan Dhalla, a 4th year student at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. The post critically analyses the judgment passed by the Bombay High Court in Tips v. Wynk earlier this year, wherein it was held that the statutory licensing scheme under Section 31D of the Copyright Act does not apply to internet broadcasting. We’d covered this judgment in an earlier post here.     Tips Industries v. Wynk Music: A Case

Tips Industries v. Wynk Music: A Case of Statutory Mis-Interpretation? Read More »

SpicyIP Events: 5th Asian IP Works-in-Progress Conference [January 9-10, 2020; Hong Kong]

We’re pleased to announce that the Applied Research Centre for Intellectual Assets and the Law in Asia (ARCIALA), School of Law, Singapore Management University will be co-organising the 5th edition of the annual ‘Asian IP Works-in-Progress Conference’ with School of Law, City University of Hong Kong on January 9-10, 2020. The deadline for submission of paper proposals is October 15, 2019. For further details, please read the announcement below: 5th Asian IP Works-in-Progress Conference [January 9-10, 2020; Hong Kong] Singapore

SpicyIP Events: 5th Asian IP Works-in-Progress Conference [January 9-10, 2020; Hong Kong] Read More »

Shamnad Basheer (1976–2019): The Man, the Academic and the Friend

While we’re all struggling to come to terms with the heart breaking loss of our Founder and Chief Mentor, Prof. (Dr.) Shamnad Basheer, we bring to you a lovely tribute to him by Prashant Reddy or the “Prolific” Prashant, as Prof. Basheer often used to fondly call him. Prashant was invited by Prof. Basheer to join the blog in 2007 and had since then worked very closely with him towards fostering transparency in the Indian IP ecosystem, both through regular

Shamnad Basheer (1976–2019): The Man, the Academic and the Friend Read More »

Happy Feet and Not-so-Happy Hands: Meaning of GI for Kolhapuri Chappals

We’re pleased to bring to you a guest post by Dr. Sunanda Bharti on the GI tag for Kolhapuri chappals. Dr. Sunanda is an Assistant Professor in Law at Delhi University. She has written two guest posts for us in the past as well, which can be viewed here, here and here. Happy Feet and Not-so-Happy Hands: Meaning of GI for Kolhapuri chappals Dr. Sunanda Bharati Introduction Though GI in favour of Kolhapuri was registered in December 2018 itself, the news

Happy Feet and Not-so-Happy Hands: Meaning of GI for Kolhapuri Chappals Read More »

The Timken Template: The Delhi High Court Ruling in Suzuki Motor v. Suzuki India

We’re pleased to bring to you a guest post by Eashan Ghosh on the recent Delhi High Court ruling in Suzuki Motor v. Suzuki India. Eashan has been in practice as an intellectual property advocate and consultant in New Delhi since 2011, and teaches a seminar on intellectual property law at National Law University, Delhi. Eashan writes about Indian intellectual property law, including a monthly review of Delhi High Court judgments, on his Medium page. He has written guest posts for

The Timken Template: The Delhi High Court Ruling in Suzuki Motor v. Suzuki India Read More »

The Sustainable Seed Innovations Project: The Story of ‘Sona Moti’

In the next post in the ongoing series on The Sustainable Seed Innovations Project, Natalie Kopytko, Post-Doctoral Research Associate at University of Leeds shares the story of a variety of wheat recently named Sona Moti. In way of context, the post briefly describes the current revival of ancient grains globally, specifically Emmer wheat varieties. The story of Sona Moti demonstrates the issues of traceability in variety development and the importance of intellectually property-broad. The Story of Sona Moti Natalie Kopytko

The Sustainable Seed Innovations Project: The Story of ‘Sona Moti’ Read More »

The Sustainable Seed Innovations Project: Model Farms and Farmers in Seva

In the next post in the ongoing series on The Sustainable Seed Innovations Project, Natalie Kopytko, Post-Doctoral Research Associate at University of Leeds shares stories of farmers creating model farms to educate others about natural farming methods. The cultivation techniques are a crucial aspect to sustainable innovations; moreover, this story discusses community support and socio-economic sustainability. Model Farms and Farmers in Seva Natalie Kopytko Cultivation of traditional varieties, often termed Desi seeds, require no external inputs (chemical fertilizers or pesticides).

The Sustainable Seed Innovations Project: Model Farms and Farmers in Seva Read More »

Creating More Copyright in Cinema: But What of the Actual Creators?

We’re pleased to bring to you a guest post by Swaroop Mamidipudi on the recent decisions in MRF v. Metro Tyres and Yash Raj Films v. Sri Sai Ganesh Productions, wherein the Delhi High Court held that making of a substantially similar copy (and not only a physical copy) of a copyrighted film amounts to infringement of copyright in the film itself. Swaroop is an advocate practicing in copyright law at the Madras High Court. He has guest blogged for us in the past as well (see here, here and here). Creating

Creating More Copyright in Cinema: But What of the Actual Creators? Read More »

Scroll to Top