Kondapalli toys get GI protection

/ By / Geographical Indication

Kondapalli toys are the most recent category of handicrafts to obtain Geographical Indications (GI) protection in India, being only the second handicraft from the state of Andhra Pradesh to receive such protection. Made in the village of Kondapalli on National Highway No. 9, 25 km from Vijaywada, this art form can be traced back to the times of Sri Krishna Deva Raya. Toy making in Kondapalli is an intricate process which even to this day is done only by hand

Kondapalli toys get GI protection Read More »

DECONSTRUCTING THE MASHELKAR COMMITTEE REPORT CONTROVERSY :PART 1

/ By / Uncategorized

Coming as I do from the relatively apolitical world of research and academia, the events of the last two weeks have taken me by surprise and left me wondering as to how easy it is for the substantive issues in any debate to get sidelined. I thought I’d reflect on the “real” issues surrounding this controversy once the “name” calling and personal/ad hominem attacks had died down. But it only seems to be getting worse. Friends keep asking me as

DECONSTRUCTING THE MASHELKAR COMMITTEE REPORT CONTROVERSY :PART 1 Read More »

The Mashelkar Committee Report on Patents: Placing it in context OR Reading the lines and not “between” them

/ By / Uncategorized

Having just completed a hectic 4 day IP conference co-organised by the George Washington University and the CII, the last thing on my mind was “intellectual property”. I just wasn’t going to sit and brood about the very topic that had “exhausted” me in those 4 days (“exhaustion” in the context of intellectual property rights is a joke that only IP aficionados will get). Fortunately or unfortunately, my flight out of Goa, where we incidentally had the last day of

The Mashelkar Committee Report on Patents: Placing it in context OR Reading the lines and not “between” them Read More »

Breach of Confidentiality – taking a few steps back?

/ By / Others

A few days ago someone in the Delhi High Court drew my attention to the decision of the Single Judge in American Express Bank Ltd. v. Priya Puri (CS(OS) No. 1442/2005). This was a case that essentially involved a breach of confidentiality/ trade secrets action against a former employee of American Express Bank. My first reaction was “Given that the Plaintiff was seeking to enforce several expressly worded confidentiality clauses in the contract of an ex-employee, coupled with actual evidence

Breach of Confidentiality – taking a few steps back? Read More »

INCENTIVISING DRUGS IN INDIA: YET ANOTHER IP LEGISLATION

/ By / Uncategorized

It appears that the government is looking at more ways to incentivise drug discovery and to encourage patenting in this regard. A news item (http://www.indiaenews.com/business/20061125/30030.htm) states: “India will soon have a law to provide incentives to scientists and public enterprises in the biotechnology sector for creating patents, Minister of Science and Technology Kapil Sibal said Saturday. ‘We are bringing in a legislation in the budget session of parliament that will enable scientists to receive one-third of the value of the

INCENTIVISING DRUGS IN INDIA: YET ANOTHER IP LEGISLATION Read More »

The ‘regressiveness’ of laptops

/ By / Uncategorized

I wondered if it would be appropriate to talk about this on a site that is by nomenclature an IP blog…but then…whats life without a little humour? I am copying an article that was published in the November 4th issue of Hindustan Times, New Delhi edition: “The Central government and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) believe a judge using a laptop—instead of paper and a pencil—might not be able to deliver justice. At least, this is what

The ‘regressiveness’ of laptops Read More »

BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS AND PATENT ELIGIBILITY

/ By / Patent

Business Method patents and the whole issue of “patent eligibility” raises its controversial head yet again, with the UK courts recently endorsing a patent office refusal to grant Australian entrepreneur and solicitor Neal Macrossan a patent for “an automated method of acquiring the documents necessary to incorporate a company. It involves a user sitting at a computer and communicating with a remote server, answering questions”. The court summarised the invention thus: “The essence of the invention is that by means

BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS AND PATENT ELIGIBILITY Read More »

PLANT VARIETY REGISTRY SET UP IN INDIA

/ By / Plant Variety Protection

The Financial Times Reports that “A National Plant Variety Registry has been set up by the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV&FR) under the Union ministry of agriculture to register crop varieties.” Folks following this debate may be aware of the fact that although this legislation was enacted in 2001, it came into force only in 2005. It seems routine now for Indian IP legislations to have more than a 3 year gap between the date of

PLANT VARIETY REGISTRY SET UP IN INDIA Read More »

AVOIDING RESPONSIBILITY: COURT ROOMS VS THE STARS?

/ By / Uncategorized

In my capacity as a visiting associate professor at GWU law school, I took a bunch of students to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to see the court in action. Unfortunately, although this is a specialized IP court, we saw only one patent case that morning–the rest were cases concerning procedural matter such as the statute of limitations (in a vaccine injury case). Unfortunately, this IP specialised court has also to contend with these sort of

AVOIDING RESPONSIBILITY: COURT ROOMS VS THE STARS? Read More »

Delhi High Court adjudicates on the “grey” area of parallel importation

/ By / Trademark

Indian courts have always towed the ‘ambiguous’ line on the issue of parallel importation in intellectual property matters – never obviously or directly pronouncing a verdict that grey market goods are “infringing” goods under the Trademarks Act, and instead granting injunctions against their imports on the basis of violations under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, etc. A 6th September order of the Delhi High Court in Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. And another v. Mr. S. Sahani [CS(OS) 1603

Delhi High Court adjudicates on the “grey” area of parallel importation Read More »

Scroll to Top