A few weeks ago we had blogged on the Sholay-Universal dispute over the licensing of ringtones to Vodafone. In its interim judgment the Delhi High Court had vacated the interim injunction against Vodafone and had ordered Universal to deposit the royalties from the Sholay ringtones with the Registry of the High Court. As noted in the interim judgment the assignment deed between Sholay and Universal was capable of being interpreted either way and the Court therefore refrained from making any observations at the interim stage. The matter therefore proceeded to the stage of trial.
However in my opinion there is the very pertinent question of why the case was not remanded to the Copyright Board for adjudication as required by Section 19A of the Copyright Act, 1957? As per Section 19A(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 all disputes pertaining to assignment deeds are supposed to be decided by the Copyright Board. In pertinent part the provision states that “(2) If any dispute arises with respect to the assignment of any copyright the Copyright Board may, on receipt of a complaint from the aggrieved party and after holding such inquiry as it considers necessary, pass such order as it may deem fit including an order for the recovery of any royalty payable”
